Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread Lars Wirzenius
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: * Make it easier for package maintainers - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that it doesn't require debhelper? -- One does not see anything

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design

2006-07-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:03:13AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: * Make it easier for package maintainers - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread James Westby
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: * Make it easier for package maintainers - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that it doesn't

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread Lars Wirzenius
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: * Make it easier for package maintainers - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ How badly is this tied

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-28 Thread James Westby
On (28/07/06 13:16), Lars Wirzenius wrote: pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: I don't like it when people make using helper packages de facto required. And debhelper isn't standard (meaning that you can expect everyone to use it), merely very common. It is also very

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design

2006-07-28 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: * Make it easier for package maintainers - One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/ How badly

Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design

2006-07-28 Thread James Westby
On (28/07/06 12:12), Manoj Srivastava wrote: On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote: pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti: But, yes, like all of debhelper it's just a convenience wrapper. If

RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

2006-07-27 Thread James Westby
Warning, long email. Executive summary. == * More consistent handling of SSL certs would be nice. * The proposed ssl-cert package is not in good shape. ssl-cert2 from http://jameswestby.net/debian/ssl-cert2-0.1.tar.gz aims to * Make it easier for package maintainers