pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
* Make it easier for package maintainers
- One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that
it doesn't require debhelper?
--
One does not see anything
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:03:13AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
* Make it easier for package maintainers
- One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
* Make it easier for package maintainers
- One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
How badly is this tied to debhelper? Any chance of designing it so that
it doesn't
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
* Make it easier for package maintainers
- One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
How badly is this tied
On (28/07/06 13:16), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
I don't like it when people make using helper packages de facto
required. And debhelper isn't standard (meaning that you can expect
everyone to use it), merely very common. It is also very
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
* Make it easier for package maintainers
- One extra dh_ call and maybe one more file in debian/
How badly
On (28/07/06 12:12), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
But, yes, like all of debhelper it's just a convenience wrapper. If
Warning, long email.
Executive summary.
==
* More consistent handling of SSL certs would be nice.
* The proposed ssl-cert package is not in good shape.
ssl-cert2 from http://jameswestby.net/debian/ssl-cert2-0.1.tar.gz
aims to
* Make it easier for package maintainers
8 matches
Mail list logo