On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 17:52:31 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
And for packages you either have to do stable updates all the time, or
add an additional repository, or use unstable on a server. Whatever you
prefer.
Not to mention debian mirrors
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 09:12:54PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:05:59PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 03/13/2011 05:53 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:20:21 +0100
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately many mirrors
Looks like it was a false alarm, all is normal again at
{http,ftp}.us.debian.org. Is ftp.us.debian.org the master node?
Same problem now also at {http,ftp}.us.debian.org?
W: Failed to fetch
bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Paul Wise [Tue, Mar 15 2011, 08:58:47AM]:
What was the reason for adding InRelease anyway?
I guess (repeating: *guess*) the main reason is that GPG signature needs
to be verified for the exact file contents. If you put them
On 2011-03-15, Peter Palfrader wea...@debian.org wrote:
Apt would then accept either version.
Of course this only makes sense for unstable which updates regularly.
For security we might consider doing it also, but re-issue a new
InRelease a few hours after the first mirror pulse that gets rid
On 03/13/2011 05:53 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:20:21 +0100
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately many mirrors doesn't use the newest version of ftpsync [0]
and therefore their two stage update of the mirror is flawed:
I wonder why does anyone
On 15/03/11 at 16:05 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 03/13/2011 05:53 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:20:21 +0100
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately many mirrors doesn't use the newest version of ftpsync [0]
and therefore their two stage update
On 03/15/2011 04:17 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Indeed, I don't know why we bother with packages at all.
Thanks for your constructive comment.
--
Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
GPG
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 03/15/2011 04:17 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Indeed, I don't know why we bother with packages at all.
Thanks for your constructive comment.
He's right though. With packages, you can receive automatic
notification of
On 03/15/2011 04:54 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Bernd Zeimetz be...@bzed.de wrote:
On 03/15/2011 04:17 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Indeed, I don't know why we bother with packages at all.
Thanks for your constructive comment.
He's right though. With
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 17:52:31 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
And for packages you either have to do stable updates all the time, or
add an additional repository, or use unstable on a server. Whatever you
prefer.
Not to mention debian mirrors don't have to run debian.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 04:05:59PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 03/13/2011 05:53 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:20:21 +0100
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately many mirrors doesn't use the newest version of ftpsync [0]
and therefore their two
git clone https://ftp-master.debian.org/git/archvsync.git
Easy enough to keep updated.
The point is that every now and then somebody decides to rewrite
and as a mirror admin i need to find out how the current way will
work, the current configuration looks like and how to fit it
into the
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Joerg Jaspert jo...@debian.org wrote:
don't even use Debian as there system. And then those that do use Debian
use stable usually (or even oldstable), meaning you have to put every
update inside there. Good luck, it's not something I want to do.
I would have
Sorry, but the problem persists, since a few days by now!
The problem seem to be continuing: apt-get update on any computer and
distribution from ftp.se.debian.org is showing the Hash Sum error!
W: Failed to fetch
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Svante R Signell s...@kth.se wrote:
Sorry, but the problem persists, since a few days by now!
The problem seem to be continuing: apt-get update on any computer and
distribution from ftp.se.debian.org is showing the Hash Sum error!
W: Failed to fetch
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:05:37AM -0400, James Vega wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Svante R Signell s...@kth.se wrote:
Sorry, but the problem persists, since a few days by now!
The problem seem to be continuing: apt-get update on any computer and
distribution from
On 2011-03-14, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Seeing how many mirrors are affected, either the apt change should be
reverted or the list of mirrors should be updated to pinpoint those that
are known to work correctly ; or both.
Or the InRelease could be dropped temporarily.
Kind regards
On Mar 14, James Vega james...@debian.org wrote:
The mirror isn't using the current version of the update script, as
described on the debian-mirrors list[0]. It should only be a transient
problem that occurs if you apt-get update while the mirror is in the
middle of a sync. Once the mirror
Same problem now also at {http,ftp}.us.debian.org?
W: Failed to fetch
bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages
Hash Sum mismatch
W: Failed to fetch
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Seeing how many mirrors are affected, either the apt change should be
reverted or the list of mirrors should be updated to pinpoint those that
are known to work correctly ; or both.
What about this: apt downloads both
#include hallo.h
* Paul Wise [Tue, Mar 15 2011, 08:58:47AM]:
What was the reason for adding InRelease anyway?
I guess (repeating: *guess*) the main reason is that GPG signature needs
to be verified for the exact file contents. If you put them into two
files then you have a certain window where
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 01:32:21PM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
when apt-updating from ftp.se.debian.org i get the following Hash Sum
mismatch failures:
(it does not happen when using ftp.us.debian.org in sources.list)
W: Failed to fetch
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 13:32, Svante Signell svante.sign...@telia.com wrote:
when apt-updating from ftp.se.debian.org i get the following Hash Sum
mismatch failures:
(it does not happen when using ftp.us.debian.org in sources.list)
APT since version 0.8.11 uses the clearsigned InRelease files
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 15:20:21 +0100
David Kalnischkies kalnischk...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately many mirrors doesn't use the newest version of ftpsync [0]
and therefore their two stage update of the mirror is flawed:
I wonder why does anyone package it? If we can get is as a package,
it's
Sorry, but the problem persists, since a few days by now!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1300048326.3792.8.ca...@hp.my.own.domain
26 matches
Mail list logo
