Re: Re: really? (Debian Policy and LSB)

2012-04-12 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le 11.04.2012 22:04, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Hmm... This contradicts section 6.1 of the Debian policy. The package management system looks at the exit status from these scripts. It is important that they exit with a non-zero status if Here

Re: really? (Debian Policy and LSB)

2012-04-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Hmm... This contradicts section 6.1 of the Debian policy. The package management system looks at the exit status from these scripts. It is important that they exit with a non-zero status if Here these scripts refer to package maintainer

Re: really? (Debian Policy and LSB)

2012-04-11 Thread Nicholas Bamber
Ah thanks. YEs that rings a bell now. On 11/04/12 21:04, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hi, On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Nicholas Bamber wrote: Hmm... This contradicts section 6.1 of the Debian policy. The package management system looks at the exit status from these scripts. It is important that they exit