Re: Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-15 Thread Micah Anderson
On 2006-03-13, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nobody mailed ftpmaster@ about the size of the NEW queue. -devel isn't a contact address for ftp-master, at least speaking for myself, mailinglists have a much lower priority than things like ftpmaster mail, and when backlogged

Re: Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-14 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Lars Wirzenius wrote: ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti: On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Is there a reason why the question should be made in private? It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists, and

Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-13 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:53:08PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: It looks approximately as though nothing has been examined since a month ago. Perhaps the ftpmasters are busy with the mirror split? Different people

Re: Regarding the NEW queue (Was: Re: NEW queue backing up again -- ftpmasters, any explanation or comment?)

2006-03-13 Thread Lars Wirzenius
ma, 2006-03-13 kello 14:59 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar kirjoitti: On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: Is there a reason why the question should be made in private? It seems as if only problems and annoyances end up on mailinglists, and *not* to [EMAIL PROTECTED]