On 29.09.2013 07:34, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:32:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau
jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
Hi,
we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
of them. The reason is they see 0 testing, nobody maintains them
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
(...)
xserver-xorg-video-sis
(...)
The SiS chipset was, unfortunately, really popular with manufacturers of
relatively expensive micro PeeCees (EzGo,
Off the top of my head, my Sun E3500 (8x 64-bit SPARC CPUs) has an SBUS
graphics adapter that is one of those cg{N} adapters, but honestly, Linux
support for E3500 is shoddy at best, so it's fine by me.
Patrick
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep
Hey,
Op 28-09-13 17:16, Bob Tracy schreef:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
(...)
xserver-xorg-video-sis
(...)
The SiS chipset was, unfortunately, really popular with manufacturers of
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
(...)
xserver-xorg-video-sis
(...)
The SiS chipset was, unfortunately, really popular with
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:32:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau
jcris...@debian.orgwrote:
(...)
xserver-xorg-video-sis
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 23:26:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
of them.
I assume here you mean maintaining them in Debian (or perhaps upstream
too?).
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 19:27:37 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 23:26:22 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
of them.
I assume
Hello,
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:26:22 +0200
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
xserver-xorg-video-s3
I'd vote for this one, but I can't maintain it, unfortunately.
--
WBR, Andrew
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
we (the debian X Strike Force) are thinking of removing the following
packages from the archive, unless somebody steps up (soon) to take care
of them. The reason is they see 0 testing, nobody maintains them
upstream, if you're lucky people keep some of them building when APIs
change, if
11 matches
Mail list logo