The Wanderer writes (Restoring the removed e16 package):
I'm not positive whether this properly belongs here; if it would be more
appropriate on another mailing list, just let me know which one.
...
As e17 does not constitute a suitable replacement for e16 for my
purposes, I have an interest
On 08/28/2012 06:51 AM, Ian Jackson wrote:
The Wanderer writes (Restoring the removed e16 package):
I'm not positive whether this properly belongs here; if it would be more
appropriate on another mailing list, just let me know which one.
On this point, I've already been advised (by Bart
The Wanderer writes (Re: Restoring the removed e16 package):
On this point, I've already been advised (by Bart Martens, in
off-list mail) that debian-mentors would probably be a more
appropriate venue.
Fair enough. I'll try to keep my response here to one point which I
think is probably
Find someone (preferably a team) to be the maintainers, prepare a
suitable package, get someone to sponsor it, and reopen all the
bugs which were closed by the removal.
I volunteer to help with the packaging work. I'm not a Debian Developer, so we
would need sponsors anyway, but I can
I'm not positive whether this properly belongs here; if it would be more
appropriate on another mailing list, just let me know which one.
I'm a long-time user of e16, which has been removed from Debian, per bug 619707.
The reasons cited for removal are that it has been replaced by e17, that it
5 matches
Mail list logo
