Hello!
On 09/25/2013 05:09 AM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For sh4, I
- test packages on this architecture
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix arch-related bugs
-
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 04:20 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-10-01 at 00:49:17 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
(about kfreebsd and hurd)
I am a DD.
在 2014年1月21日，下午9:51，Aníbal Monsalve Salazar ani...@debian.org 写道：
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:43:55PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 13:31, schrieb Aníbal Monsalve Salazar:
For mips/mipsel, I - fix toolchain issues together with other
developers at ImgTec
It is nice to see such
Am 16.01.2014 13:31, schrieb Aníbal Monsalve Salazar:
For mips/mipsel, I - fix toolchain issues together with other developers at
ImgTec
It is nice to see such a commitment, however in the past I didn't see any such
contributions.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:43:55PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 16.01.2014 13:31, schrieb Aníbal Monsalve Salazar:
For mips/mipsel, I - fix toolchain issues together with other
developers at ImgTec
It is nice to see such a commitment, however in the past I didn't see
any such
Hi,
Just for the record.
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For mips/mipsel, I
- test packages on these architectures on my own machines at home and at
ImgTec
- fix toolchain issues together with other
Hi everyone,
I am part of the group of MIPS porters, and we missed to officially
respond to this email. Here is for the record:
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For MIPS,MIPSEL,MIPS64,MIPS64EL, I
Hi everyone,
I am part of the group of MIPS porters, and we missed to officially
respond to this email. Here is for the record:
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For MIPS,MIPSEL,MIPS64,MIPS64EL, I
Hi everyone,
I am part of the group of MIPS porters, and we missed to officially
respond to this email. Here is for the record:
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For MIPS,MIPSEL,MIPS64,MIPS64EL, I
Hello,
2013/10/7 Riku Voipio riku.voi...@iki.fi:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve
McIntyre (DD)
armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD),
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
armel: Wookey (DD), Gatis Visnevskis (!DD), Nobuhiro Iwamatsu (DD), Steve
McIntyre (DD)
armhf: Jeremiah Foster (!DD, but NM?), Wookey (DD), Justus Winter (!DD),
Lennart Sorensen (!DD),
Hi Niels,
I don't know upto what point you are familiar with my history and its link to
the powerpc
port, but it pains me to see that the powerpc port is left with so few porters,
and that it
may mean the port being dropped. I also have not really followed the mailing
lists since
a long
On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 01:06:01AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of
my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 10:59:26AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
[...]
sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||1
Hi,
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4
armhf || 3 || 1 || 2 ||6
hurd-i386 || 5 || 0 || 3 ||8
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4
armhf || 3 || 1 || 2 ||
On 10/02/2013 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
[...]
sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||1
[2] By the looks of it, if sparc was replaced by sparc64, we could be
Hi,
[I've replaced debian-ports with debian-sparc in the recipients list]
Niels Thykier wrote:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
[…]
sparc[2] || 1 || 0 || 0 ||1
[…]
[2] By the looks of it, if sparc was
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:18:58PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 ||
On a related note, I idly wonder whether anyone is interested
in an official ARMv6 hf port. The rpi community is massive.
To be clear I'm not volunteering to be involved, merely curious.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Quoting Jonathan Dowland (2013-10-02 13:51:06)
On a related note, I idly wonder whether anyone is interested
in an official ARMv6 hf port. The rpi community is massive.
To be clear I'm not volunteering to be involved, merely curious.
Are you aware of any other hardware that would benefit from
Add me for armel.
Bastien
Le 2 oct. 2013 09:46, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net a écrit :
Hi,
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:17:31PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Quoting Jonathan Dowland (2013-10-02 13:51:06)
On a related note, I idly wonder whether anyone is interested
in an official ARMv6 hf port. The rpi community is massive.
To be clear I'm not volunteering to be involved, merely
+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
Hi,
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1 ||4
armhf || 3 || 1 || 2 ||
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
+++ Niels Thykier [2013-10-02 09:45 +0200]:
Hi,
The final results are in:
Summary table:
Arch || DDs || NMs/DMs || Other || Total
---++-++-++---++--
armel || 3 || 0 || 1
Hello, all.
I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the s390x
architecture.
I am familiar with zSeries system programming and have a lot of
experience in running Linux in virtual environments, mostly z/VM on
large IBM processors.. I use Linux for 11 year, family with cross
I'm interesting in helping on ia64. I'm not fluent in ia64 assembly, but I
can get around pretty well. I'm very experienced in C/C++/Java and
debugging. I've got a fully functional system running Xorg/Mesa3D/sound, so
I can reproduce, test, and fix issues as time permits.
Patrick Baggett
On
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of
my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due
to outdated packages. On a first glance it looks like missing BinNMUs
for the Perl 5.14 to
Him
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:44:44 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Yesterday I tried to setup a sparc64 chroot on a second disc in one of
my Sparcs, but the currently documented way[1] to do so failed[2] due
to outdated packages. On a first glance it looks like missing
Hi,
Nothing motivates like a deadline...
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386, I
- test many packages on this architecture
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix
Hi,
I am not currently a porter but I would like to be one for the Hurd.
I do some test on QEMU and public Hurd host.
I am familiar with system programming and have some embedded and printer
driver development experience. I use Linux for 11 year, family with cross
compiling tool chain.
I
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For sh4, I
- test packages on this architecture
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix arch-related bugs
- maintain buildds
For armel and armhf, I
- test packages on this
Hi,
b...@decadent.org.uk said:
I've also provided a couple of kernel patches in the past. I'm cross
testing with Gentoo to ensure that bugs I report are Debian-specific
or ia64-generic.
I'll continue testing/software development activity on ia64 for the
Jessie cycle, and more
Hello,
I am an active tester/user for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For powerpc, ppc64, I
- test most base packages on this architecture
- test d-i on this architecture
- follow debian-powerpc on at least a daily basis
-
Hi,
I'm a long-time ia64 Debian user ( 10 years). I'm mostly focused on
desktop aspects (GNOME, Iceweasel, LibreOffice, Qt Creator, C++ 3D
software development) while most other ia64 users that I know are more
inclined on server use.
I'm not a DD/DM, but daily update my ia64 workstation, report
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 19:36 +0200, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
Hi,
I'm a long-time ia64 Debian user ( 10 years). I'm mostly focused on
desktop aspects (GNOME, Iceweasel, LibreOffice, Qt Creator, C++ 3D
software development) while most other ia64 users that I know are more
inclined on server use.
On 21-Sep-13, at 7:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'll continue testing/software development activity on ia64 for the
Jessie cycle, and more generally, until Debian drops ia64. I'm
already
waiting for Wayland on ia64 and other big updates.
So please, keep ia64 in the bandwagon ;-)
But I
Hi,
I am an active tester (not always porter) for the following architectures and I
intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
i386, amd64, armel
- test most base packages on this architecture (every day tasks)
- test arch-related things
- test lots of ipv6 related issues
FWIW, I am a porter of the Alpha architecture in the following ways:
- run a buildd
- kernel support
- work with upstreams for toolchain support
- general porting work including filing bugs and patches
I doubt if I will continue that for the life cycle of Jessie given that
many of the former
I have not been involved before in the porting effort but may be interested if
there is a need. I have a few alpha platforms and ia64. Could someone describe
or point me to a Web page that describes what is involved? I have a c
programming background for a lot of years and am now a java
i have a HP Visualize B2000 that i managed to install last night from iso
distribution that i found after a lot of looking. at this point only
terminal is working. will keep reading to get debian up and running.
i would like to get involved. will need some additional information on what
is needed
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:19:24AM -0400, Federico Sologuren wrote:
i have a HP Visualize B2000 that i managed to install last night from iso
distribution that i found after a lot of looking. at this point only
terminal is working. will keep reading to get debian up and running.
i would like
On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
overview of which of the porters are (still)
Hi!
I'm not a DD or DM, but an upstream contributor and maintainer for the
toolchain, both for different things at work, and in my free time for the
Hurd. I have no plans to stop this, so this will cover the jessie
lifetime. As time permits, I also work on the Hurd itself, and advise
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
hurd-i386
ia64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I'm particularly keen to see communication packages working on as many
architectures as possible because otherwise two-way communications
opportunities are missed if some users are excluded.
In short, I'm not formally volunteering, but if people
Hi,
I am an active porter for the alpha architecture in that I run two
buildd servers and I intend to continue this for the lifetime of the
jessie release:
For alpha, I
- test some packages on this architecture
- maintain buildds
I am not a DD/DM
Bill MacAllister
--
Bill MacAllister
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For SPARC64, I
- test a lot of the packages for KDE4 Desktop
- testing and currently preparing patches for Iceweasel
- test Vanilla build of the Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
overview of which of the porters are
Hi,
I am an active porter for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For kfreebsd-*, I
- test packages on this architecture
This includes running a Desktop (Notebook) System on testing and am
therefore testing the relevant stack
Hi, sorry I'm not a skilled programmer, I just have a historic SGI O2 to
play around with a bit. If the hardware dies, I won't really have any
reaspn to stay involved with this port.
-Adam
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 20:18 -0400, Adam Holland wrote:
Hi, sorry I'm not a skilled programmer, I just have a historic SGI O2 to
play around with a bit. If the hardware dies, I won't really have any
reaspn to stay involved with this port.
Still cool that you have one though!
--
Kip Warner --
52 matches
Mail list logo
