Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-04-09 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
El sábado, 6 de abril de 2019 17:55:35 -03 Guillem Jover escribió: [snip] > If what you are interested in though is just a small subset of the > archive, another option that would benefit everyone and is perhaps > less cumbersome than having to jugle around with multiple archives > and package

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-04-09 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2019-04-09 at 06:48:59 +, Mo Zhou wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 10:55:35PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > If what you are interested in though is just a small subset of the > > archive, another option that would benefit everyone and is perhaps > > less cumbersome than having to

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-04-09 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Guillem, Thanks for your helpful pointers. On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 10:55:35PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > If what you are interested in though is just a small subset of the > archive, another option that would benefit everyone and is perhaps > less cumbersome than having to jugle around

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-04-06 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2019-02-08 at 16:25:41 +, Mo Zhou wrote: > For most programs the "-march=native" option is not expected to bring any > significant performance improvement. However for some scientific applications > this proposition doesn't hold. When I was creating the tensorflow debian >

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-02-08 Thread Mo Zhou
On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:14:43PM +0800, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Mo, > > Very interesting initiative. I understand it will Intel-specific for > the moment. What is your vision in opitmizing with AMD CPUs? Thanks for your interest. This project didn't mention AMD CPU because I have no experience

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-02-08 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi Drew, On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:07:47PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote: > On 2019-02-09 03:25, Mo Zhou wrote: > > I think it would be more constructive to provide arch-specific packages for > eigen/blas etc on amd64 which Conflict/Replace/Provide the standard > packages. > > That way a local

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-02-08 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Mo, Mo Zhou writes: > For most programs the "-march=native" option is not expected to bring any > significant performance improvement. However for some scientific applications > this proposition doesn't hold. When I was creating the tensorflow debian > package, I observed a significant

Re: SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-02-08 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2019-02-09 03:25, Mo Zhou wrote: Hi folks, For most programs the "-march=native" option is not expected to bring any significant performance improvement. However for some scientific applications this proposition doesn't hold. When I was creating the tensorflow debian package, I observed a

SIMDebian: Debian Partial Fork with Radical ISA Baseline

2019-02-08 Thread Mo Zhou
Hi folks, For most programs the "-march=native" option is not expected to bring any significant performance improvement. However for some scientific applications this proposition doesn't hold. When I was creating the tensorflow debian package, I observed a significant performance gap between