Re: SONAME migration: from liblambda0 to liblambda1

2013-07-17 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-07-15, Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net wrote: When the SONAME increments the associated binary library package has a new name, so the SONAME suffix has to increment as well accordingly: for a library package lambda, the binary library package could be renamed from liblambda0 to

SONAME migration: from liblambda0 to liblambda1

2013-07-15 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello List: When the SONAME increments the associated binary library package has a new name, so the SONAME suffix has to increment as well accordingly: for a library package lambda, the binary library package could be renamed from liblambda0 to liblambda1. I thought that I could manage all of

Re: SONAME migration: from liblambda0 to liblambda1

2013-07-15 Thread Игорь Пашев
2013/7/15 Jerome BENOIT g62993...@rezozer.net: the former binary package liblambda0 is not discarded by the new binary package liblambda1, neither in Sid nor at the upgrading stage with aptitude. I guess that something is missing in `debian/control', any clue ? I think this is intentional.