Re: Source requirements and debian/missing-sources/ (was: "Browserified" stuff)

2016-10-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
On 2016-10-12 21:22, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:00:50PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Who cares about yaccs and > > bisons? > > You're thinking small. Why not ship a pre-compiled ELF, built with some > paid version of ICC (screw silly sods on AMD chips like me[1]). I

Re: Source requirements and debian/missing-sources/ (was: "Browserified" stuff)

2016-10-12 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 09:00:50PM +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Martín Ferrari : > >I had always understood that rebuilding from source was a hard > >requirement. Is this not the case any more? > > > >I don't think that shipping a binary compiled upstream should be

Source requirements and debian/missing-sources/ (was: "Browserified" stuff)

2016-10-12 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Quoting Martín Ferrari : I had always understood that rebuilding from source was a hard requirement. Is this not the case any more? I don't think that shipping a binary compiled upstream should be allowed, so where's the line drawn? This is an interesting question indeed.

Re: Source Requirements

2014-04-29 Thread Thomas Koch
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 02:26:49 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Recently there have been a number of questions about source requirements for the Debian archive. The FTP master view of this are based on both item 1 of the social contract (Debian will remain 100% free) and item 2 of the DFSG

Re: Source Requirements

2014-04-29 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 29 April 2014 21:02, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote: On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 02:26:49 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Recently there have been a number of questions about source requirements for the Debian archive. The FTP master view of this are based on both item 1 of the social contract

Re: Source Requirements

2014-04-29 Thread Cameron Norman
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov x...@debian.org wrote: On 29 April 2014 21:02, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote: On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 02:26:49 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Recently there have been a number of questions about source requirements for the Debian archive

Re: Source Requirements

2014-04-29 Thread Andreas Barth
* Dimitri John Ledkov (x...@debian.org) [140429 23:34]: On 29 April 2014 21:02, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote: On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 02:26:49 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: Recently there have been a number of questions about source requirements for the Debian archive. The FTP master

Re: Source Requirements

2014-04-29 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Barth a...@ayous.org writes: * Dimitri John Ledkov (x...@debian.org) [140429 23:34]: of course not, do a bootstrap each time, or provide a separate bootstrap package in the archive, such that other people can reproduce the boostrap process. circular build-dependency on one-self is

Re: Source Requirements

2014-04-28 Thread Ben Finney
Scott Kitterman deb...@kitterman.com writes: Recently there have been a number of questions about source requirements for the Debian archive. The FTP master view of this [is:] We consider source packages to be part of the Debian system and as such all files in source packages must come