❦ 15 mars 2015 15:38 -0500, John Goerzen jgoer...@complete.org :
I found out today that roundcube was removed from Debian testing due to
some unfixed bugs. I investigated a bit further and found that:
- 1.1.0 has long been released upstream, but:
- the watch file never picked it up,
On 2015-03-15 21:38, John Goerzen wrote:
On 03/14/2015 07:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
The main difficulty is to handle the 0.9.5 to 1.x upgrade where the
configuration files change.
I assume you mean the config files change in some dramatic way; that is,
some way that means the existing
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Christian Kastner deb...@kvr.at wrote:
On 2015-03-15 21:38, John Goerzen wrote:
On 03/14/2015 07:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
The main difficulty is to handle the 0.9.5 to 1.x upgrade where the
configuration files change.
I assume you mean the config files
On 03/14/2015 07:36 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 14 mars 2015 11:11 +0100, Dominik George dominik.geo...@teckids.org :
I found out today that roundcube was removed from Debian testing due to
some unfixed bugs. I investigated a bit further and found that:
- 1.1.0 has long been released
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:38 AM, John Goerzen wrote:
If that is the case, why does this have to be a big deal? Couldn't you
just warn people that the upgrade will break their config, point them to
the docs, and call it good? After all, if that is all upstream
provides, isn't it better than
Hi,
I found out today that roundcube was removed from Debian testing due to
some unfixed bugs. I investigated a bit further and found that:
- 1.1.0 has long been released upstream, but:
- the watch file never picked it up, and
- the package VCS is stuck at an unreleased 1.0.0
- A
❦ 14 mars 2015 11:11 +0100, Dominik George dominik.geo...@teckids.org :
I found out today that roundcube was removed from Debian testing due to
some unfixed bugs. I investigated a bit further and found that:
- 1.1.0 has long been released upstream, but:
- the watch file never picked it
7 matches
Mail list logo
