* Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk schrieb:
However I have to say that Debian as a whole cannot have it both
ways. Either ftp-master lifts the restriction on
Is there any hard reason for such restrictions ?
small modules or there has to be decent support for components. I have
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, David Bremner wrote:
Well, OK, I see your point. But what should we do about e.g. tiny perl
modules. My/our impression was that ftp-master was not keen on having
many small packages. For example, libcatalyst-modules-perl has installed
size of 1468k, but bundles 81 modules.
Raphael,
Thanks for the feedback.
However I have to say that Debian as a whole cannot have it both
ways. Either ftp-master lifts the restriction on
small modules or there has to be decent support for components. I have
started work on this
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
I have recently looked into a number of bundle packages. All of them
have different implementations of the debian/rules although the ones
I looked at had clearly once had a common parent. Hence I have been
kept awake at night thinking how this
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 21:29:29 +0200, Raphael Hertzog hert...@debian.org wrote:
In the article, I mentionned that bundling unrelated software is not a
good idea in general (mainly because there's no common software
version to use).
So I think that we should not create any infrastructure to
I have been looking into the packaging of bundles - that is packages
that have multiple upstream sources. There was recently an article on
the subject:
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/09/07/how-to-use-multiple-upstream-tarballs-in-debian-source-packages/
.
However one must notice this quote:
6 matches
Mail list logo
