On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, S?ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
So, my question is, how long should an ITP be allowed to just sit there
before someone else (in this case myself or anyone else who would be
interested) can go ahead and hijack it?
Consider ITP's as advisory locks. If
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, S?ren Boll Overgaard wrote:
So, my question is, how long should an ITP be allowed to just sit there
before someone else (in this case myself or anyone else who would be
interested) can go ahead and hijack it?
As a general rule, until you run out of
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
Hi,
An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
June. Since then, for various reasons, no package has been uploaded, and
someone other then the original submitter of the ITP has committed to
lør, 2003-09-27 kl. 03:29 skrev Glenn Maynard:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
Your footnotes are dangling.
My apologies:
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=196504
lør, 2003-09-27 kl. 07:14 skrev Anthony Towns:
[...]
Consider ITP's as advisory locks. If you're interested in maintaining
a package then it's useful information on how to avoid work (email the guy,
get whatever he's done so far), or a useful advisory of who might be worth
cooperating with (do
Hi,
An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
June. Since then, for various reasons, no package has been uploaded, and
someone other then the original submitter of the ITP has committed to
uploading a package. However, nothing has happened for nearly a month
now, and
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Søren Boll Overgaard wrote:
An ITP[1] on thunderbird[2] was originally submitted to the BTA back in
Your footnotes are dangling.
--
Glenn Maynard
7 matches
Mail list logo
