Re: Transitional packages with conffiles

2011-03-17 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk writes: Goswin von Brederlow writes (Transitional packages with conffiles): Looking into the cause we discovered that the problem is that dhcp3-client is now a transitional package that pulls in isc-dhcp-client. The new package expects its config

Re: Transitional packages with conffiles

2011-03-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Goswin von Brederlow writes (Transitional packages with conffiles): Looking into the cause we discovered that the problem is that dhcp3-client is now a transitional package that pulls in isc-dhcp-client. The new package expects its config files in /etc/dhcp while the old had /etc/dhcp3

Re: Transitional packages with conffiles

2011-03-16 Thread brian m. carlson
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:01:37PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: Well surely the question is: why are the files moved to a different directory ? Why is the package renamed, even ? Do we need to be able to co-install the old and new ISC DHCP clients ?! The original dhcp-client was version 2.

Transitional packages with conffiles

2011-03-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
is that dhcp3-client is now a transitional package that pulls in isc-dhcp-client. The new package expects its config files in /etc/dhcp while the old had /etc/dhcp3/. The changes made to the old config no longer affect the new client. Which brings me to the subject of this mail: Transitional packages

Re: Transitional packages with conffiles

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On a somewhat related note: If a package is manually installed, then replaced with a transitional package, then apt should mark the transitional package's dependencies as manually installed and the transitional package as automatically installed. Otherwise, when one removes the transitional