Hi Matthias,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.09.2013 14:52, schrieb Sergei Golovan:
>>
>> There are 17 packages which build when 8.5 is the default version but
>> fail to build
>> after switching to 8.6. Most of them are patchable, though I'm not
>> sure if they wil
Hi Wookey,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Sergei Golovan [2013-09-25 12:25 +0400]:
>> Hi fellow developers,
>>
>> I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk
>> packages.
>
> Thank you for doing this work, and for this clear summary.
>
>> 1. Multia
+++ Sergei Golovan [2013-09-25 12:25 +0400]:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
> I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk
> packages.
Thank you for doing this work, and for this clear summary.
> 1. Multiarchifying Tcl/Tk. This means splitting out the libtcl8.5
> package wi
Hello,
On 25 September 2013 14:52, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> There are about 30 packages left which unconditionally depend on
> tcl8.4 or tk8.4.
> We have to do some research and find how to port them to 8.5 or 8.6.
When I have some free time, I occasionally port this or that package.
Actually, I'
Hi Matthias,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan:
>> Hi fellow developers,
>>
>> I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk
>> packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse
>> depe
Hi Cyril,
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> (replying to the first part only since it strikes me)
>
> Sergei Golovan (2013-09-25):
>> 2. Renaming tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev into libtcl8.5-dev and
>> libtk8.5-dev respectively (the latter packages still provide
Hello,
On Sep 25, 2013 11:40 AM, "Matthias Klose" wrote:
> Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan:
> > removing alternatives a lot. But later I'd like to have another
> > transition (switching to 8.6 as default Tcl/Tk version).
> Do you have numbers what will break with 8.6?
Not many thing
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan:
>> Hi fellow developers,
>>
>> I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk
>> packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse
>> dependencies which
On 2013-09-25 11:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > 3. Renaming tcl-dev and tk-dev into libtcl-dev and libtk-dev. Since
>> > too many packages have versioned build-dependencies on tcl-dev or
>> > tk-dev, I chose to retain tcl-dev and tk-dev packages (as
>> > meta-packages which depend on libtcl-dev an
Am 25.09.2013 10:25, schrieb Sergei Golovan:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
> I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk
> packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse
> dependencies which will need a transition, I think. The proposed
> changes are a
Hi Sergei,
(replying to the first part only since it strikes me)
Sergei Golovan (2013-09-25):
> 2. Renaming tcl8.5-dev and tk8.5-dev into libtcl8.5-dev and
> libtk8.5-dev respectively (the latter packages still provide the
> former as virtual packages to break as few packages as it could be).
>
Hi fellow developers,
I would like to introduce a few significant changes into Debian Tcl/Tk
packages. Some of them have quite significant impact on their reverse
dependencies which will need a transition, I think. The proposed
changes are already in the experimental branch, so anyone could try
an
12 matches
Mail list logo
