On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
The problem is the : in your .changes name. The match is:
re_taint_free = re.compile(r^[-+~/\.\w]+$);
You probably
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Manoj Srivastava:
Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The primary
purpose of policy is
Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was
that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string
was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is explicitly allowed by policy (if there
is an epoch, then the upstream version can
On 14 Apr 2006, Florian Weimer spake thusly:
* Manoj Srivastava:
Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally
viable technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The
primary purpose of policy is to
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 03:54:27PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As other people have pointed out later in the thread, my point was
that I was _not_ having an epoch with dots in it; my version string
was 0:1.2.7:1.2.8-1, which is explicitly
Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Apt on the other hand (wrongfully) tracks explicitly if you have not
epoch or an epoch of 0.
Crap. :-( I forgot to remove the explicit zero epoch from my next
upload. Are you telling me that if I leave no epoch in my following
upload, apt won't
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060413 06:05]:
A colon is explicitly allowed if the version contains an epoch. In
this case, the build generate file names which contain a colon,
too, and I'd expect them to be rejected in the same manner (they
look essentially the same because the
On 14 Apr 2006, Bernhard R. Link stated:
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060413 06:05]:
A colon is explicitly allowed if the version contains an epoch.
In this case, the build generate file names which contain a
colon, too, and I'd expect them to be rejected in the same manner
(they
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Technically, this is not a dpkg-source but because dpkg (and APT) do
not validate version numbers. Some ISVs rely on this and they use
forbidden characters in version strings ('_' seems to be quite common,
for example). And I suspect that there are
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060414 14:55]:
Policy has (besides other things) the job of documentating current
practice.
Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
technical options
* Manoj Srivastava:
Not quite correct. Policy has the job of docmenting what is
technically correct, and selecting one of a number of equally viable
technical options where numerous possibilities exist. The primary
purpose of policy is to ensure that diverse packages under
On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
Wrong place where you asked. The problem is the : in your .changes
name. The match is: re_taint_free =
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
The problem is the : in your .changes name. The match is:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
The
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:08:21AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10622 March 1977, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
Which uses debian/changelog ... the : is used to indicate a period,
period can be used to use smaller upstream version if you increased it by
error (or if you really need to use an older upstream version).
The period should be a single digit in
* Raphael Hertzog:
Edit debian/changelog, and change the : by + and you're probably done.
Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog:
Edit debian/changelog, and change the : by + and you're probably done.
Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
Which part? 5.6.12 already talks about that.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy,
* Frank Küster:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog:
Edit debian/changelog, and change the : by + and you're probably done.
Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
Which part? 5.6.12 already talks about that.
A colon is explicitly allowed if the version
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frank Küster:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog:
Edit debian/changelog, and change the : by + and you're probably done.
Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
Which part? 5.6.12 already talks about that.
A colon
On 12 Apr 2006, Russ Allbery said:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Frank Küster:
Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Raphael Hertzog:
Edit debian/changelog, and change the : by + and you're
probably done.
Shouldn't policy be updated to reflect this?
Which part? 5.6.12
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 01:10:39AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with dput to the
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with dput to the
anonymous queue on ftp-master. The upload goes well, I see them if I
ftp
23 matches
Mail list logo
