Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Hendrik Sattler [Mon, 29 May 2006 20:58:19 +0200]: > PS: I bravely accept some flames for this suggestion... Sure, here, have some: - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg01393.html - http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg00752.html - http://lists.debian.org/debian-l

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote: > Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster: > > Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that > > problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed > > libssl from etch, and upload t

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 10:27 schrieb Frank Küster: > Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that > problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed > libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable?  After checking that it > works in unstable, of course.

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:27:45AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that > problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed > libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? After checking that it > works in unstable,

Re: Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, 29 May 2006 10:27:45 +0200, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Would it be acceptable to build bacula (or any other package with that >problem) in an etch environment, or on sid with manually installed >libssl from etch, and upload that to unstable? No, that won't fix the problem for

Uploading packages built against testing? (was: openssl will block bacula into etch?)

2006-05-29 Thread Frank Küster
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hmm. But openssl is in testing already, and bacula doesn't build-dep >> on a newer version. Why does it matter? > > The *binary* packages require a newer version of openssl, they would > be uninstallable in testing. > > http://packages.debian.org/uns