On Mon, January 31, 2011 18:09, Christian PERRIER wrote:
However, upstream's policy in their stable branches is alway to only
fix important bugs (they don't call them this way...but the
definition is fairly close to Debian's). So, *in the case of samba*, I
can guarantee that the user's (indeed
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Mon, January 31, 2011 18:09, Christian PERRIER wrote:
However, upstream's policy in their stable branches is alway to only
fix important bugs (they don't call them this way...but the
definition is fairly close to Debian's). So, *in the case of
Thijs Kinkhorst writes (Re: Upstream stable branches and Debian freeze):
In the past such things have not been allowed with the argumentation that
even though stable may contain bugs, users rely on the behaviour that
stable has. They may know about a bug but may have worked around
On 2011-02-01, Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
This argument seems very absolutist and would seem to suggest we
should never do any stable release updates at all. But a user who
wants that level of stability can simply not take the stable release
updates, and only apply the
Hi, Ian:
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 14:11:44 Ian Jackson wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst writes (Re: Upstream stable branches and Debian freeze):
In the past such things have not been allowed with the argumentation that
even though stable may contain bugs, users rely on the behaviour that
stable
2011/2/1 Jesús M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net:
So, may I propose (if not already done) a document that outlines with enough
detail what Debian maintenance policy is and why from an upstream point of
view, and then allow for within Stable upgrades for software that has
demonstrated to
Hi, Olaf:
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 17:18:58 Olaf van der Spek wrote:
2011/2/1 Jesús M. Navarro jesus.nava...@undominio.net:
So, may I propose (if not already done) a document that outlines with
enough detail what Debian maintenance policy is and why from an upstream
point of view, and
Hi,
I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of mpd, currently in testing.
These bugs were already fixed in newer maintenance releases.
I know that Debian does not
Hi
Dne Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:11 +0100
Max Kellermann m...@duempel.org napsal(a):
I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of mpd, currently in testing.
These
Michal Čihař, le Mon 31 Jan 2011 16:01:54 +0100, a écrit :
Dne Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:11 +0100
Max Kellermann m...@duempel.org napsal(a):
I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
who use the
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:25:11 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
Hi,
I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of mpd, currently in testing.
These bugs were already
Quoting Max Kellermann (m...@duempel.org):
I'm the upstream maintainer of the Music Player Daemon project, and
receive a number of support requests / bug reports from Debian users
who use the outdated version 0.15.12 of mpd, currently in testing.
These bugs were already fixed in newer
]] Samuel Thibault
Hi,
| His question could be rephrased: will the 6.0.x updates be allowed to
| pick up new upstream stable fixes releases?
While I can't speak for the release team (neither the stable or the
«regular» one), I know that postgresql stable releases are generally
allowed into new
13 matches
Mail list logo
