Pierre THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Scribit Ian Jackson dies 29/06/2007 hora 14:28:
I think it's a bug that we try to do upgrades from release A to B
using A's packaging tools.
In most case, IME, it worked. In the cases where we know it won't,
couldn't the packaging tools be notified
Hi,
It's my understanding that dpkg now supports the Breaks dependencies,
and I also recall there was some discussion around last minute fixes
before etch to support Breaks, but what's the final status: are we
allowed to use Breaks in packages for unstable/lenny?
Thanks,
--
Loïc
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
Hi,
It's my understanding that dpkg now supports the Breaks dependencies,
and I also recall there was some discussion around last minute fixes
before etch to support Breaks, but what's the final status: are we
allowed to use Breaks in
Loïc Minier writes (Use of Breaks dependencies):
It's my understanding that dpkg now supports the Breaks dependencies,
and I also recall there was some discussion around last minute fixes
before etch to support Breaks, but what's the final status: are we
allowed to use Breaks in packages
Scribit Ian Jackson dies 29/06/2007 hora 14:28:
I think it's a bug that we try to do upgrades from release A to B
using A's packaging tools.
In most case, IME, it worked. In the cases where we know it won't,
couldn't the packaging tools be notified of the issue (much like the
requires file of
5 matches
Mail list logo
