Re: Bill Allombert 2006-03-28 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please always keep the full Debian changelog information in the package.
Of course, you can move very old changelog entry to changelog.old or
changelog.1 if they cause problems, but ship them in the deb.
Please don't even do that, the changelog
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes for sure, but useless zipped information is useless
anyway.
And you know it's useless how?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
debian changelog files.
Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable - stable
updates
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
before oldstable release. Based on the assumption that oldstable - stable
updates occur more or less over the whole stable+1 development circle.
So
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 08:13:24PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
On Sunday 26 March 2006 20:18, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
debian changelog files.
Rather arbitrarily, just feels more or less safe: cut everything from
before
Hi,
what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
debian changelog files. I mean there are package with very
active upstream and years old changelog which grew and grew
over the years.
Is there a way to handle these changelog entries which bloat
the package and contain only
On 10605 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
what would be the appropriate way to handle large and old
debian changelog files.
Keep.
Is there a way to handle these changelog entries which bloat
the package and contain only information which are too old
to be useful or is it ok if for example
Hi,
* Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-26 20:32]:
On 10605 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
Is there a way to handle these changelog entries which bloat
the package and contain only information which are too old
to be useful or is it ok if for example a changelog file
would
Nico Golde wrote:
I thought about changelogs like:
2001-04-06 mitch 20:18:29Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is not a Debian changelog, and your original question talked about
those.
Many upstreams split their own changelogs occasionally. If you like,
suggest to yours
Hallo Antti,
* Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-26 20:52]:
Nico Golde wrote:
I thought about changelogs like:
2001-04-06 mitch 20:18:29Michael Natterer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is not a Debian changelog, and your original question
talked about those.
Urgs
10 matches
Mail list logo
