spam getting worst than I thought!
as long as the white list do not grow up...
De : Stephen Gran [sg...@debian.org]
Date d'envoi : 22 mai 2009 17:30
À : dda
Objet : Who uses @packages.d.o mail?
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs
Hi,
I've always found package@packages.debian.org as the easiest way to
contact the maintainer and anyone involved, for example if I'm working
on a particular package I'll contact the co-maintainers using that
mailing list.
It is also good because you don't need to request for a mailing list
On May 23, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
practice for this scenario?
Implement spam filtering?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
day
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
day
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 23, Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca wrote:
I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
practice for this scenario?
Implement spam filtering?
I think adding the lists.debian.org and bugs.debian.org ruleset[1] to
On Fri 22 May 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
day from elsewhere. I haven't done an
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
from
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines (primarily ries), and about 1000 spams a
day
Bill Allombert wrote:
I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
practice.
BTS automatically adds maintainers of package where bug went to To/CC of
reassign mail, doesn't it?
--
Eugene V.
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
What about requiring a GPG signed email by key in developers or
maintainers keyring?
As others have already mentioned, the addresses are also intended as
contact point for upstream developers and users, i.e. people who don't
have such a key.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:46:08PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
practice.
BTS automatically adds maintainers of package
Stephen Gran wrote:
It sounds like the service should probably stay open. I would have been
happy to restrict something that is only a spam attractor, but if it's
more than that, than I'm happy people find it a useful service. If the
teams who do use it think it can still be useful and be
Eugene V. Lyubimkin jackyf.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
practice.
BTS automatically adds maintainers of package where bug went to To/CC
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 12:58:32PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Eugene V. Lyubimkin jackyf.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill Allombert wrote:
I use packages.debian.org each time I reassign a bug to a package to make
sure the new maintainer is notified. I think this should be a best
practice.
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said:
The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to
keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews
and the subsequent translations.
This one time, at band camp, Adeodato Simó
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
day from elsewhere. I haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems
pretty clear so far that the domain does not get any significant amount
of legitimate mail from machines other than the debian.org hosts.
If this is actually the case, I'd like to
I use b...@packages.debian.org to contact the maintainer of blah. I
use this to alert maintainers of reverse build-deps when I do
something drastic to one of the libraries I maintain.
I'm open to other options, of course. What is the recommended
practice for this scenario?
Thanks,
-Steve
Hello Stephen,
On Friday 22 May 2009 16:30:03 Stephen Gran wrote:
[...]
If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
Much appreciated. Thanks.
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines (primarily ries),
* Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org [2009-05-22 23:30:03 CEST]:
If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
from debian.org
On Fri, 22 May 2009 22:30:03 +0100
Stephen Gran sg...@debian.org wrote:
Hello all,
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to
packages.debian.org, and it looks like it collects some useful mail
from automated scripts on various debian.org machines (primarily
ries), and about 1000
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
If this is actually the case, I'd like to close the domain down to only
accept mail from other debian.org machines. If it's not, I'd like to work
with people who do use it to either make it possible to send their mail
from
I haven't done an exhaustive survey, but it seems pretty clear so far
that the domain does not get any significant amount of legitimate mail
from machines other than the debian.org hosts.
As I understand it, pkg@packages.d.o is the standard way of contacting
the maintainers of a package in an
On Friday 22 May 2009, Stephen Gran wrote:
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
I always use it to CC the maintainer(s) of a package I reassign a bug to,
or if I want to CC a package maintainer on some discussion.
For me it's the most natural address to use,
On Friday 22 May 2009, Neil Williams wrote:
Maybe a list of packages that do use it and an address to email for
those who want to start using it at a later date?
That would defeat its purpose. It is not about which maintainers use it,
but about who uses it to contact maintainers.
Cheers,
FJP
On May 22, Raphael Geissert atom...@gmail.com wrote:
@packages.d.o is known to be the easiest way to get in touch with a
maintainer, and is often used when CC'ing maintainers of multiple packages.
Then it needs to be fixed, soon, because it the last few weeks I started
receiving a huge
This one time, at band camp, Jonathan Wiltshire said:
The debian-l10n-english team, and perhaps others, use this domain to
keep the maintainer in the loop during Smith English-language reviews
and the subsequent translations.
This one time, at band camp, Adeodato Simó said:
I use it all the
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to
packages.debian.org, (...) it seems pretty clear so far that the
domain does not get any significant amount of legitimate mail from
machines other than the debian.org hosts.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:30:03PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
So I've looked through a few weeks of mail logs to packages.debian.org,
and it looks like it collects some useful mail from automated scripts
on various debian.org machines
30 matches
Mail list logo
