On 5/29/19 11:01 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019, Ansgar wrote:
>> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 May 2019, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
One of the popular answers to this and some other problems is "nobody sat
down and wrote the
Hi,
Why to support additional fragmentation?
My opinion is debian was left behind regarding infrastructure. I do
packaging for
various distributions.
Honestly, I am running debian. But you could provide continues integration for
different architectures, not only i386 and amd64.
Extend access
> "Paul" == Paul Wise writes:
Paul> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:32 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
>> LTS is accepted by the Debian community.
Paul> I'm not entirely sure this fully represents the range of feelings
Paul> about the LTS efforts.
Paul> There are a few things that
Hi,
On Mon, 03 Jun 2019, Paul Wise wrote:
> There are a few things that are possibly concerning:
Thanks for sharing those. Let me answer them.
> Freexian is essentially the only available-to-hire provider of
> services for Debian LTS, as the Freeside link doesn't lead anywhere
> useful. This
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:32 AM Holger Levsen wrote:
> LTS is accepted by the Debian community.
I'm not entirely sure this fully represents the range of feelings
about the LTS efforts.
There are a few things that are possibly concerning:
Freexian is essentially the only available-to-hire
hi,
just commenting on two bits now:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:17:07AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
> > I heard that this didn't
Quoting Helmut Grohne (2019-05-31 07:17:07)
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
> >
> > I heard that this didn't work out well the last time ("dunc tank"),
> > though
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:46:48AM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
>
> I heard that this didn't work out well the last time ("dunc tank"),
> though that was before the time I followed Debian development.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:01:44AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
> > I heard that this didn't work out well the last time ("dunc tank"),
> > though that was before the time I followed Debian development.
> Yes, I was there (and mention it briefly in the
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Mo Zhou wrote:
> For example, many years ago I proposed that we could hire some
> web developers to rewrite our homepage, to make it more good-looking
> (Generally I don't care about superficial stuff but our homepage
> is really old enough. Look at Gentoo's
Hi,
On 2019-05-29 08:38, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
I totally support the idea that we should find more valuable usage
of our fund. For example, if developers don't have enough time or
don't want to do something difficult, we could hire somebody else
to fix
On Wed, 29 May 2019, Ansgar wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 May 2019, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > One of the popular answers to this and some other problems is "nobody sat
> > > down and wrote the code". Not sure what can we do about this class
On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 10:38 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2019, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > One of the popular answers to this and some other problems is "nobody sat
> > down and wrote the code". Not sure what can we do about this class of
> > reasons.
>
> Use the $300,000 on
Hi,
On Wed, 29 May 2019, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> One of the popular answers to this and some other problems is "nobody sat
> down and wrote the code". Not sure what can we do about this class of
> reasons.
Use the $300,000 on our bank accounts?
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 08:43:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> IMHO this touches another burning topic: Its not that we do not want to
> provide some PPA equivalent - its just that we do not realise it. I do
> not remember how many years ago we talked about bikesheds (and
> obviously we even
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 07:54:20AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> As an example, Ubuntu makes it easy to add side-loaded channels (ppas).
> we don't.
IMHO this touches another burning topic: Its not that we do not want to
provide some PPA equivalent - its just that we do not realise it. I do
not
16 matches
Mail list logo
