Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 18:37 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Christian, > > On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote: > > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources > > has the following versions of src:libreoffice. > > > > Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 > > Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 > > Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 > > > > But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. > > $ rmadison libreoffice --suite buster-backports > libreoffice | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source > libreoffice | 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source, armel > libreoffice | 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 | buster-backports | source, amd64, > arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x > > explains already one version: the armel one. A little bit of further digging suggests that someone[TM] should file an RM report for: libreoffice-gtk2 | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x uno-libs3| 6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x which appear to be cruft. Regards, Adam
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
Hi Christian, On 02-10-2020 17:05, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2020-10-02 09:34, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is >> mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. >> >> Same for 2.34-0.1. > > Could this perhaps be a Release-specific attribute that's not present in > every Source index? > > I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources has > the following versions of src:libreoffice. > > Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 > Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 > Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 > > But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. $ rmadison libreoffice --suite buster-backports libreoffice | 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source libreoffice | 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 | buster-backports | source, armel libreoffice | 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 | buster-backports | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x explains already one version: the armel one. Paul signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
On 2020-10-02 09:34, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is > mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. > > Same for 2.34-0.1. Could this perhaps be a Release-specific attribute that's not present in every Source index? I've stumbled another case in buster-backports [1], where Sources has the following versions of src:libreoffice. Version: 1:6.3.4-2~bpo10+1 Version: 1:6.4.5-1~bpo10+1 Version: 1:7.0.1-1~bpo10+2 But none of the records have "Extra-Source-Only: yes" set. [1] http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/buster-backports/main/source/Sources.xz
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
Stéphane, thanks for the fast reply! On 2020-10-02 09:34, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 02/10/2020 à 08:57, Christian Kastner a écrit : >> numerous versions of some of the packages. >> >> Those three versions happen to be the current versions from stable, >> testing, and unstable. Does anyone know why these are all in this one file? >> The version from unstable is the most surprising. > > > 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is > mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. I wasn't aware of this field, good to know. > Same for 2.34-0.1. > > 2.36-3 is the current version in testing. I compiled the list late last night and could have sworn that 2.36-3 is from unstable, but I guess my eyes were too tired already.
Re: archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
Le 02/10/2020 à 08:57, Christian Kastner a écrit : > I happened to stumble over the fact that bullseye Sources files contain > numerous versions of some of the packages. > > For example: > > $ wget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/source/Sources.gz > > $ zgrep -A 2 'Package: util-linux' Sources.gz | grep -v Binary > Package: util-linux > Version: 2.33.1-0.1 > -- > Package: util-linux > Version: 2.34-0.1 > -- > Package: util-linux > Version: 2.36-3 > > Those three versions happen to be the current versions from stable, > testing, and unstable. Does anyone know why these are all in this one file? > The version from unstable is the most surprising. 2.33.1-0.1 has "Extra-Source-Only: yes", so one if its binaries is mentioned in "Built-Using" of some other package. Same for 2.34-0.1. 2.36-3 is the current version in testing. Cheers, -- Stéphane
archive: bullseye Sources files contain multiple versions of packages - why?
I happened to stumble over the fact that bullseye Sources files contain numerous versions of some of the packages. For example: $ wget http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/bullseye/main/source/Sources.gz $ zgrep -A 2 'Package: util-linux' Sources.gz | grep -v Binary Package: util-linux Version: 2.33.1-0.1 -- Package: util-linux Version: 2.34-0.1 -- Package: util-linux Version: 2.36-3 Those three versions happen to be the current versions from stable, testing, and unstable. Does anyone know why these are all in this one file? The version from unstable is the most surprising.
