new location? It would be quite annoying, IMHO, to have it pointing
> at the wrong place for the life of Squeeze.
#595726 - Update dput.cf for new backports.debian.org host
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
gregor herrmann schrieb am Monday, den 06. September 2010:
Hi,
> > You should also update your dput/dupload config, uploading to
> > backports-master.debian.org instead of www.backports.org
>
> http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/ talks about
> backports.debian.org, s
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 11:51:12PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> You should also update your dput/dupload config, uploading to
> backports-master.debian.org instead of www.backports.org
>
> For the next days uploads to the old location will be forwarded, but at
> some point this will stop, so u
On Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:51:12 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> You should also update your dput/dupload config, uploading to
> backports-master.debian.org instead of www.backports.org
http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/ talks about
backports.debian.org, something is confusing here :)
> The backports service still uses its own version of the keyring. Therefore
> if you want to put packages onto backports you have to coordinate with the
> backports team to have your uploads accepted. Please follow the procedure
> outlined in [2]. Support for Debian Maintainers (DM) is expected
> The backports service still uses its own version of the keyring. Therefore
> if you want to put packages onto backports you have to coordinate with the
> backports team to have your uploads accepted. Please follow the procedure
> outlined in [2]. Support for Debian Maintainers (DM) is expected
Alexander Wirt wrote:
> I'm strongly against that. I want packages properly tested and in your own
> interest you should wait for testing migration of your packages. (of course
> there can be exception, but not in general).
>
> I want well tested packages in bpo (which means tested by users, not
Re: Bernd Zeimetz 2010-06-30 <4c2b6f9b.8030...@bzed.de>
> > I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> > backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> > backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BT
On 06/30/2010 02:53 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
80 mess
Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> Hello again,
>
> I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
> backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
> backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to u
Hello again,
I have another question: backports-user is quite high traffic, but to upload
backports it is required to be subscribed. Will this change for
backports.debian.org? Will the users be invited to use the BTS?
Cheers,
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
* Andrei Popescu [2010-06-30 13:10:20 CEST]:
> On Mi, 30 iun 10, 12:58:25, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > I'm strongly against that. I want packages properly tested and in your own
> > interest you should wait for testing migration of your packages. (of course
> > there can be exception, but not in gen
On Mi, 30 iun 10, 13:18:59, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the backports upload queue could automatically put the package on
> > hold until the unstable package has migrated to testing.
> Send patches :)
Sorry, should have mentioned it's just an ideea of mine and I posted it
for the benef
Andrei Popescu schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> On Mi, 30 iun 10, 12:58:25, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> > >
> > > When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
> > > upload of backports prepared by the o
On Mi, 30 iun 10, 12:58:25, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
> >
> > When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
> > upload of backports prepared by the original maintainer, before testing
> > migration. For instance in s
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 19:47:52 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
> upload of backports prepared by the original maintainer, before testing
> migration.
I, for one, certainly hope this one won't be relaxed.
Cheers,
Julien
Charles Plessy schrieb am Wednesday, den 30. June 2010:
Hi,
*snip*
> Thanks for the fast answer!
>
> First of all, I would like to make clear that I am not trying to bikeshed
> xulrunner: I am more self-centered than this and was only thinking on how to
> use backports.deb
uld like to make clear that I am not trying to bikeshed
xulrunner: I am more self-centered than this and was only thinking on how to
use backports.debian.org for the Debian Med packages (this is why I opened a
separate thread).
When I asked about relaxing the rules, I was in particular thinking about
Hi,
> Dear Alexander, backport.org people, and everybody,
>
> If I understand correctly, it is planned to incorporate the backports.org
> service as an official Debian repository.
Thats true.
>
> I would like to know if the policy of use for backports.debian.org has alread
Dear Alexander, backport.org people, and everybody,
If I understand correctly, it is planned to incorporate the backports.org
service as an official Debian repository.
I would like to know if the policy of use for backports.debian.org has already
been discussed, drafted or decided. In particular
hould offer him to manage it for him.
> > Thats not true. What I said to you is that we won't upgrade dak before
> > backports.debian.org as this would mean doubling the work.
>
> Has it been decided that backports.debian.org would be a separate
> dak installation?
Afaik t
On 2010-03-26, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Otherwise it might well be that the backports suite are going to be
> directly managed on ftp-master.debian.org. That way it's
> automatically mirrored, etc.
FWIW that's also the case for volatile. We're basically waiting for
ftp-master to do the integrati
to you is that we won't upgrade dak before
> backports.debian.org as this would mean doubling the work.
Has it been decided that backports.debian.org would be a separate
dak installation?
Otherwise it might well be that the backports suite are going to be
directly managed on ftp-master.debian.o
23 matches
Mail list logo
