On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:41:27AM +0900, Iustin Pop wrote:
Sorry for reviving and old email. To what extend do you think this
should apply - even at individual package level?
I ask this because of the following: recently I had a 1-1 discussion
with a co-maintainer of one of my packages,
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:48:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
- I've made the private email aliases considered harmful point [10],
in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions
in Debian that could happen only through private email addresses.
There are some
[Iustin Pop]
Could/should Debian make it easier for each package to have an own email
list (i.e. making it easier to have 1-person team maintenance)?
We have {pkg}@packages.debian.org and {srcpkg}@packages.qa.debian.org.
I don't know if mail to these aliases get archived, but at least it is
Stefano Zacchiroli lea...@debian.org writes:
Before that, let me highlight that this is the right moment to ramp up
our efforts for Wheezy. The planned freeze date [1] is June 2012 ---
only 6 months away
Point of order: June 2012 is, as I write this, 7½ months away.
- I've made the private
4 matches
Mail list logo
