On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 13:56 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > If you do this, I'd also suggest dropping in a rule for
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/libravatar, as I will eventually be moving t
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this
> > > snippet into their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css file:
> > >
>
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this
> > snippet into their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css file:
> >
> > img[src^="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/lib
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Don Armstrong , 2013-10-01, 17:10:
> >The avatars are now fully federated, and all caching and retrieval
> >is now done from debian.org resources, which should mitigate the
> >privacy concerns.
>
> Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can pu
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Next up I guess is finding a way to have DSA setting up something to
> host avatars for @debian.org addresses. hint hint :)
I guess they would want to replace the current db.debian.org code with ud first:
https://github.com/LucaFilipozzi/ud/
On 2013-10-02, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The avatars are now fully federated, and all caching and retrieval is
Yay!
> Anyone who wants to set up their own
> http://wiki.libravatar.org/running_your_own/, or you can use libravatar
> or gravatar if you do not wish to do so (or you can do nothing, and
* Don Armstrong , 2013-10-01, 17:10:
The avatars are now fully federated, and all caching and retrieval is now
done from debian.org resources, which should mitigate the privacy concerns.
Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this snippet into
their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chr
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:34:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > And I will be implementing caching to address the concerns about web
> > tracking, and more importantly, the lack of federation. See #703119
> > et al.
>
> The caching is a good idea, alth
* Paul Wise , 2013-03-23, 09:39:
If your browser downloads an image, then the server hosting the image
at the very least knows your IP.
If your browser was obeying you, it wouldn't download the web tracking
images.
Yeah, let's blame the victims.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 09:35 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> If your browser downloads an image, then the server hosting the image
> at the very least knows your IP.
If your browser was obeying you, it wouldn't download the web tracking
images.
PS: please don't CC me, I'm subscribed.
--
bye,
p
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 05:12:30PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Christoph Biedl manchmal.in-ulm.de> writes:
>
> > Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> > added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
>
> It’s not only disgusting but also breaks display in Lynx by
> a
Christoph Biedl manchmal.in-ulm.de> writes:
> Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
It’s not only disgusting but also breaks display in Lynx by
adding *lots* of empty lines where there were none before,
plus a 1x1 pixel imag
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 03:06:47PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> In this case, though, what about making the request on the BTS' side? This
> would reveal nothing about the user who actually reads a bug page to
> gravatar. The bandwidth needed to do so is totally negligible.
I think that's what
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:35:13AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:17:16PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> >
> > > The bigger concern is that this is a web bug, whether it wants to be
> > > or not. Whoever hosts any o
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:17:16PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>
> > The bigger concern is that this is a web bug, whether it wants to be
> > or not. Whoever hosts any of the images being included knows the IP
> > address and time of every visit
On 2013-03-20 19:17, Bart Martens wrote:
> Since you ask, I suggest to disable it now and enable it later only
> after opt-in.
Maybe the do not track header could be honored.
--
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:30:46AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Additionally, if you don't want to see them, you can append
> ;avatar=no. I'll also enable this to be set by default using cookies
> too. [But since the BTS doesn't use cookies at all currently, please
> don't hold your breath.]
Don'
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Bart Martens wrote:
> The caching is a good idea, although I don't think it fully solves
> the discussed concerns.
Which concerns discussed doesn't it address?
1. Caching on the BTS side means that no one besides bugs.debian.org
knows which bugs you are viewing.
2. The only
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:34:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > I too find this totally unacceptable default (to have this enabled
> > by default with just the not even yet implemented option to
> > opt-out).
>
> It has already been implemented. See
>
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> The bigger concern is that this is a web bug, whether it wants to be
> or not. Whoever hosts any of the images being included knows the IP
> address and time of every visitor to a bug report.
Only if you use a web browser that is obeying ot
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I too find this totally unacceptable default (to have this enabled
> by default with just the not even yet implemented option to
> opt-out).
It has already been implemented. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/03/msg00302.html
And I will be im
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 20. März 2013, Arno Töll wrote:
> ... which "assign[s] random color shit
> to [your] name" [1]. You've got the choice to use an avatar, or someone
> assigns one to you.
that has been fixed.
> Either way, there is a
> thread on debian-project and maybe we could stick with one.
I
Hi Arno,
Arno Töll writes:
> ... which "assign[s] random color shit
> to [your] name" [1]. You've got the choice to use an avatar, or someone
> assigns one to you.
FYI, this is not a technical necessity. If called correctly, gravatar
(so probably libravatar, too) can return a specific image, e.g.
On 2013-03-21 02:15:18 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 11:54 PM, Pascal Giard wrote:
> > I would have much preferred to have this disabled by default.
>
> I would have preferred the picture thing to be hosted
> without gravatar support (libravatar is hosted by a DD,
> and you
On 20.03.2013 19:15, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> To the contrary, I see them as possibly causing prejudice based on
>> look
>
> Nobody forces anyone to upload a picture in libravatar.
... which "assign[s] random color shit
to [your] name" [1]. You've got the choice to use an avatar, or someone
assig
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > and thus I don't quite see the
> > value added by the pictures.
> I do.
I still don't. But I can live with it.
> Nobody forces anyone to upload a picture in libravatar.
>
> Nobody forces anyone to upload *only* "real" picture of
> you on
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:46:00AM -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 18. März 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> > > added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
> > It's not tracking, it's showing an avatar. That's no
On 03/20/2013 11:54 PM, Pascal Giard wrote:
> I would have much preferred to have this disabled by default.
I would have preferred the picture thing to be hosted
without gravatar support (libravatar is hosted by a DD,
and you can host your avatar yourself if you like to).
> In short:
> I don't se
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 18. März 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
>> > added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
>> It's not tracking, it's showing an avatar. That's not quit
Hi,
On Montag, 18. März 2013, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> > added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
> It's not tracking, it's showing an avatar. That's not quite the same thing.
this is not tracking, those are facebook like butt
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> > Paul Gevers wrote...
> >
> > > Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
> > > don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
> >
> > Now it's appearently back
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:06:26AM +0100, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote...
>
> > Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
> > don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
>
> Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> added, as seen in #70
On 18-03-13 10:06, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Paul Gevers wrote...
>
>> Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
>> don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
>
> Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
> added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting
Paul Gevers wrote...
> Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
> don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
Now it's appearently back online, but a web tracking has been
added, as seen in #703298. That's disgusting.
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-d
Hi,
Am 15.03.2013 20:14, schrieb Paul Gevers:
Hi
Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
I do not think that you are alone.
The latest bug that I can find is 703078. The next one [1] fails and
after that it says it can n
Hi
Is it just me or am I the only one getting bug reports from bugs that
don't seem to exist on bugs.debian.org.
The latest bug that I can find is 703078. The next one [1] fails and
after that it says it can not be found.
An error occurred. Error was: Bad bug log for Bug 703079. Unable
36 matches
Mail list logo
