On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:02:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-10-28 17:20:02) at debian-vote@l.d.o
> > For the compiler, all of Debian is built with GCC, but some teams do
> > test builds with Clang and report bugs, which most maintainers merge
> > and some don't.
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Speaking of which: Is it Policy or just habit to use GCC over Clang?
gcc still generates better machine code than clang in the *general* case for
C source (I don't know about the rest). There is no policy to use gcc: if
your program builds better usi
Hi,
Jonas Smedegaard:
> Speaking of which: Is it Policy or just habit to use GCC over Clang?
>
Well, when Debian was started, clang didn't even exist – also, for a
long time it wasn't compatible with quite a few GCCisms in our sources
and/or rules files.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 17:02 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> doxygen (and a very few others) links against libclang1-3.5
> "where available" according to the changelog, ...
> libllvm3.5 is also used for another few, including mesa.
It's not so much a question whether these packages are compiled
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-10-28 17:20:02) at debian-vote@l.d.o
>> For the compiler, all of Debian is built with GCC, but some teams do
>> test builds with Clang and report bugs, which most maintainers merge
>> and some don't.
>
> Speaking
Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-10-28 17:20:02) at debian-vote@l.d.o
> For the compiler, all of Debian is built with GCC, but some teams do
> test builds with Clang and report bugs, which most maintainers merge
> and some don't.
Speaking of which: Is it Policy or just habit to use GCC over Clang?
I
6 matches
Mail list logo
