* Thomas Viehmann [Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:20:13 +0100]:
Adeodato Simó wrote:
I fixed this to sort entries by age, HTH.
Thomas: I didn't have the PHP-energy to look at integrating your patch
at this stage, prod me about it in the future if you'd like.
Well, I cannot blame you. I do not
* Steve M. Robbins [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:06 -0500]:
Hi,
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since
the latest build is buried in other
Adeodato Simó wrote:
I fixed this to sort entries by age, HTH.
Thomas: I didn't have the PHP-energy to look at integrating your patch
at this stage, prod me about it in the future if you'd like.
Well, I cannot blame you. I do not intend to keep it lying around when
it's not used, though.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:04:46PM +0100, Adeodato Sim?? wrote:
* Steve M. Robbins [Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:42:06 -0500]:
Hi,
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
Can this be fixed? The current
Raphael Geissert wrote:
So, let's test it with a script I wrote during DC8 (as suggested by Lucas):
Thanks to Raphael's test suite, the (mainly regarding the not fully
parenthesized succession of ( ? : ), but also treating empty Debian
revisions), the comparision now works for all valid versions
Neil Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 20:02 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[1] I promised Christoph Berg that I am going to write a PHP extension,
[actually
an interface, to libapt's functions; but I haven't been lucky enough to find
the docs (libapt-pkg-doc isn't what I expected). If
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 20:02 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
[1] I promised Christoph Berg that I am going to write a PHP extension,
actually
an interface, to libapt's functions; but I haven't been lucky enough to find
the docs (libapt-pkg-doc isn't what I expected). If somebody can point me to
* Thomas Viehmann [Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:11:09 +0100]:
If someone could attest to
http://buildd.debian.org/~tviehmann/cmp_versions_php.txt
(translated from the perl that udd uses) being wrong in only harmless
ways (except showing that C-Perl-PHP with the last step being done by
someone
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 21:11, Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since
the latest build is buried in other output.
If someone could attest to
http://buildd.debian.org/~tviehmann/cmp_versions_php.txt
(translated from
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
In this specific case, he was already CCed on Steve's mail which began
this thread...
Didn't notice it, sorry for the noise.
Adam
Cheers,
Raphael Geissert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
It seems that build.php relies on the results of opendir/readdir to be
in order and that assumption not
Martín Ferrari wrote:
[...]
If it's of any use, the PET project has a implementation from scratch
of Debian version comparison, made by reading policy and dpkg code.
The only bug I know of is that it doesn't reject some invalid
versions.
To be more precise:
$ ./test pet.pl
pet.pl failed
Hi,
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since
the latest build is buried in other output.
Thanks,
-Steve
[1]
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Steve M. Robbins schrieb:
Hi,
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
Can this be fixed? The current situation is less than useful since
the
Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
You should report a bug against qa.debian.org / www.debian.org.
Neither of those is the correct contact/package regarding
buildd.debian.org. I guess we don't have a metapackage for w-b and
buildd.d.o. Maybe eventually
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 12:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Peter Palfrader wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
You should report a bug against qa.debian.org / www.debian.org.
Neither of those is the correct contact/package regarding
buildd.debian.org. I guess we
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Peter Palfrader wrote:
Neither of those is the correct contact/package regarding
buildd.debian.org. I guess we don't have a metapackage for w-b and
buildd.d.o. Maybe eventually that will be fixed.
If whoever would be responsible for it files a wishlist bug asking for
it to
Hi,
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
The buildd log pages, e.g. [1], used to be sorted by package version
(or maybe build date). However that is no longer the case.
It seems that build.php relies on the results of opendir/readdir to be
in order and that assumption not being valid anymore.
Can this
18 matches
Mail list logo
