On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us wrote:
On Monday, March 05, 2012 10:42:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
...
Friendly discussion with the maintainer of debian-multimedia.org to
not replace libraries such as libavcodec and friends have failed
ultimatively (BTW,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us
wrote:
On Monday, March 05, 2012 10:42:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
...
Friendly discussion with the maintainer of debian-multimedia.org to
not
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Reinhard Tartler siret...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us
wrote:
On Monday, March 05, 2012 10:42:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
...
Friendly discussion with the maintainer of debian-multimedia.org
On Monday, March 05, 2012 10:42:50, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
...
Friendly discussion with the maintainer of debian-multimedia.org to
not replace libraries such as libavcodec and friends have failed
ultimatively (BTW, that is part of the reason why we've ended up with
an epoch of '4', dmo uses
OoO Pendant le temps de midi du samedi 10 mars 2012, vers 12:30, Eric
Valette eric.vale...@free.fr disait :
Yes acknowledged that vlc and mplayer are now up-to-date.
vlc 0.5.3 was released on April, 8 2003. Debian package on April, 14 2003.
vlc 0.8.6a was released on January, 4 2007.
When exactly was vlc not up-to-date on Debian?
As long as it is unable to play dvd or various codec that are non
supported given the option for compiling libav for example
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:44:50AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian Squeeze has a very nice set of packages that will make
a good fit for this platform. What do you think will be lacking
exactly?
XBMC, up to date ffmpeg at least with some non-free
[CC Eric - drop all other CCs]
On 12-03-11 at 03:54pm, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 11:44:50AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Debian Squeeze has a very nice set of packages that will make a
good fit for this platform. What do you
While debian-multimedia.org has gained a reputation of providing
packages, which were desperately lacking in Debian,
IMO this repository has turned into a major source of trouble and
pissed users provoking flamewars in the recent past. There is still a
number of remaining multimedia-related
On 03/10/2012 05:07 PM, Eric Valette wrote:
The problem is that debian per se
1) is unusable for any serious multimedia usage.
1/ I don't agree.
2/ Please define serious.
what are the version of VLC, ffmpeg, xbmc provided by debian?
In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can check
On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can check all
of this easily by yourself using packages.debian.org. Or
are you trying to make the point that Debian has outdated
packages?
I ask you a question: what are the version of the packeges in debian
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 11:44 +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
I ask you a question: what are the version of the packeges in debian
unstable and in debian-multimedia.org trying to be factual. I know the
answer, I just would like someone from debian to write it down ;-)
I know the version already
On 10/03/2012 11:44, Eric Valette wrote:
I know the version already yes. And yes debian is completely outdated.
To be fair, but catching up at least for vlc, mplayer...
Still no xbmc, handbrake, libdvbcsa tough and quite old ffmpeg
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 10/03/2012 12:03, Eric Valette wrote:
On 10/03/2012 11:44, Eric Valette wrote:
I know the version already yes. And yes debian is completely outdated.
To be fair, but catching up at least for vlc, mplayer...
Still no xbmc, handbrake, libdvbcsa tough and quite old ffmpeg
mythtv,
Yes acknowledged that vlc and mplayer are now up-to-date.
Libav vs ffmpeg could be per se part of the debate. We could also speak
about compilation options and induced feature/codec support
what about xbmc, mythv, tvheadend, avidemux?
-- eric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 11:44:50 +0100, Eric Valette eric.vale...@free.fr wrote:
On 10/03/2012 11:14, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In where? Stable? SID? Backports? FYI, you can check all
of this easily by yourself using packages.debian.org. Or
are you trying to make the point that Debian has
On 10/03/2012 12:40, Philip Hands wrote:
Really?
Again, vlc or mplayer do not make a multi-media capable distribution.
take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the packages
they provide
Read
On 12-03-10 at 12:30pm, Eric Valette wrote:
Yes acknowledged that vlc and mplayer are now up-to-date.
Libav vs ffmpeg could be per se part of the debate. We could also
speak about compilation options and induced feature/codec support
what about xbmc, mythv, tvheadend, avidemux?
Well, you
On 12-03-10 at 01:34pm, Eric Valette wrote:
On 10/03/2012 12:40, Philip Hands wrote:
Really?
Again, vlc or mplayer do not make a multi-media capable distribution.
take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the
packages they provide
Read
take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the
packages they provide
Readhttp://thelinuxcauldron.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/the-list-the-top-5-media-center-programs-for-linux/
and see the one you have.
Ahh, so your definition of serious multimedia is media centers.
On 12-03-10 at 04:39pm, Eric Valette wrote:
take a look at yavdr, openelec, geexbox, ubuntu studio and the
packages they provide
Readhttp://thelinuxcauldron.wordpress.com/2009/04/14/the-list-the-top-5-media-center-programs-for-linux/
and see the one you have.
Ahh, so your
Eric Valette eric.vale...@free.fr writes:
Thanks for not copying me. Afraid I was going to answer?
This mailing list, like all sensibly-run mailing lists, does not munge
the ‘Reply-To’ field. If you have a conversation in a public forum, the
onus is on you to participate in the discussion in
On 2012-03-05 16:42:50 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
Friendly discussion with the maintainer of debian-multimedia.org to
not replace libraries such as libavcodec and friends have failed
ultimatively (BTW, that is part of the reason why we've ended up with
an epoch of '4', dmo uses epoch '5');
On 2012-03-08, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
It's worse than that. Security support is non-existent, and users
don't know that. An example: [… non-free package …]
Well, non-free in Debian proper doesn't have security support neither. But
then I guess one could argue that users at
On 2012-03-08 12:35:53 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2012-03-08, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.net wrote:
It's worse than that. Security support is non-existent, and users
don't know that. An example: [… non-free package …]
Well, non-free in Debian proper doesn't have security support
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:23:33AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Di, 06 Mär 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
the Blends framework. I would most probably drop some file
/etc/apt/preferences.d/01-disable-dmo.pref
in multimedia-config metapackage (where all other metapackages
On Di, 06 Mär 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
I wonder what criterion of serios bug would apply here. Just for the
sake of interest because I do not intend to implement this personally.
Too lazy to search for it, but overriding a configuration of a
system admin is for sure not allowed. If it would
Hey.
Stupid question... but even for those packages, which Debian provides
now itself (by the fine work of the pkg-multimedia-maintainers)... are
they build with all the options enabled?
I believe to remember that there were some cases where mp4 stuff was
disabled then...
I surely haven't had
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst th...@debian.org wrote:
But before getting there, the question is whether the existence of the
website (and its popularity) poses problem to Debian reputation and/or
to the activity of official Debian multimedia packaging. I think this is
a
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
In summary, I can only advise everyone against enabling that
repository on any machine.
If I would have time to become a pkg-multimedia member I would try to
establish installing multimedia applications via metapackages build be
On 12-03-05 at 11:04pm, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
In summary, I can only advise everyone against enabling that
repository on any machine.
If I would have time to become a pkg-multimedia member I would try to
establish
On Di, 06 Mär 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
the Blends framework. I would most probably drop some file
/etc/apt/preferences.d/01-disable-dmo.pref
in multimedia-config metapackage (where all other metapackages usually
And I would file a serious bug against that. There is no
32 matches
Mail list logo
