Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-06-10 Thread Don Armstrong
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
 I don't object to a suitable Debian developer who wants to take over
 maintenance of lilypond. They should contact me directly.

Speaking of which, I just uploaded an NMU for the new version (2.12.2)
after discussing this with Thomas. I personally don't have a problem
working a bit with a team, though I'd rather avoid being primarily
responsible for the package if at all possible.


Don Armstrong

-- 
Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence on
society.
 -- Mark Twain 

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-06-09 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
I don't object to a suitable Debian developer who wants to take over
maintenance of lilypond.  They should contact me directly.

Thomas



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-06-07 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi,

Paul Wise a écrit :
 It looks like lilypond is unmaintained in Debian, so that is unlikely
 to happen until it gets a new maintainer or newly active maintainer.
 CCing the maintainer, hopefully they will respond.

It appears that lilypond is actively maintained in ubuntu[1].
I'd like to take over this package in Debian but I don't know about the
practices when a package is already maintained in Ubuntu:
* should I start from the Ubuntu source package?
* the Ubuntu lilypond release is now 2.12.1-0ubuntu1; what should be the
debian release then? 2.12.1-1?
* or simply persuade the ubuntu maintainer to package it for Debian ;)
(cc-ing him)?

Thanks in advance,

_Gilles.

[1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lilypond


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-06-07 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce  début d'après-midi ensoleillé du dimanche  07 juin 2009, vers
15:59, Gilles Filippini gilles.filipp...@free.fr disait :

 It appears that lilypond is actively maintained in ubuntu[1].
 I'd like to take over this package in Debian but I don't know about the
 practices when a package is already maintained in Ubuntu:
 * should I start from the Ubuntu source package?
 * the Ubuntu lilypond release is now 2.12.1-0ubuntu1; what should be the
 debian release then? 2.12.1-1?
 * or simply persuade the ubuntu maintainer to package it for Debian ;)
 (cc-ing him)?

You could also propose to package it as a team.

For the  version number,  yes, Debian version  should be  2.12.1-1.
-- 
BOFH excuse #335:
the AA battery in the wallclock sends magnetic interference


pgpDfesKa8HRO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-06-07 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il giorno Sun, 07 Jun 2009 15:59:55 +0200
Gilles Filippini gilles.filipp...@free.fr ha scritto:

 It appears that lilypond is actively maintained in ubuntu[1].
 I'd like to take over this package in Debian but I don't know about
 the practices when a package is already maintained in Ubuntu:
 * should I start from the Ubuntu source package?

You could do it if you plan to include Ubuntu changes in Debian. If you
decide to package it from scratch, Ubuntu will merge your package
applying Ubuntu adjustments on top of it until there is need to.

 * the Ubuntu lilypond release is now 2.12.1-0ubuntu1; what should be
 the debian release then? 2.12.1-1?

Yes.

 * or simply persuade the ubuntu maintainer to package it for Debian ;)
 (cc-ing him)?

Ubuntu usually haven't designed maintainers, think of it as a global QA
effort to have package in shape. If you want, you can contact the last
person who touched it to see if he has interest in maintaining it, but
it is usually not the case.

-- 
 . ''`.  Luca Falavigna
 : :'  :  Ubuntu MOTU Developer
 `. `'` Debian Maintainer
   `-  GPG Key: 0x86BC2A50


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-06-07 Thread Grammostola Rosea

Gauvain Pocentek wrote:

Hi all,

On 06/07/2009 03:59 PM, Gilles Filippini wrote:
  
really don't want to take over the package without interaction with Thomas.

But I'm definitly interesting in helping out with this package, maybe in a team
as Vincent Bernat suggested in an other mail.

  
Maybe you can put the package in the Debian Multimedia Team and help 
maintaining it?


\r

http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-05-26 Thread rosea grammostola
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:25 AM, Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com
 wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 16:56:39 schrieb Rob Canning:
  hi,
  we really need to get 2.12 into debian asap
  it seems that the maintainer is too busy with other stuff at the moment
 as
  it seems that all threads re this on debian maintainer page have gone
 dead.
  perhaps someone else can do a non-maintainer upload? i'm not sure about
 the
  ettiquette or debian policy on this exactly but maybe its time to start
  looking in to that - i dont want to hassle thomas in cc  if he is busy
 but
  i belive he is on this list - any suggestions?

 Kubuntu has 2.12.1 packages, so they might be a good starting point...


Could someone fix Lilypond in Debian. There are also some people busy with
packaging Frescobaldi for Debian, but it isn't possible to upload it without
having Lilypond fixed and updated to the recent stable version.

Thanks in advance,

\r


Re: debian and lilypond 2.12

2009-05-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:44 AM, rosea grammostola
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:

 Could someone fix Lilypond in Debian. There are also some people busy with
 packaging Frescobaldi for Debian, but it isn't possible to upload it without
 having Lilypond fixed and updated to the recent stable version.

It looks like lilypond is unmaintained in Debian, so that is unlikely
to happen until it gets a new maintainer or newly active maintainer.
CCing the maintainer, hopefully they will respond.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org