Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Awesome :D. I took a look at liquidprompt and the article having just seen the email I'm responding to. It'll take a little getting used to, but I'm liking it. I've just been using plain defaults (gnome terminal, bash/dash) here except one customisation of re-enabling the colour prompt to better

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hello! ma 8. kesäk. 2020 klo 12.04 Arturo Borrero Gonzalez (art...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > > On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Sorry for being late to the discussion, but I'd like to share my dotfiles and setup script that I use for my Debian Testing machines. https://salsa.debian.org/samueloph/dotfiles I just updated the README.md to explain the high level of it. In summary, this is what I use to setup vim, atom, i3,

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hi! Thanks for all the tips! I have a long todo of programs to test out now. One additional source of great Debian Developer wisdom about command-line terminal app / interpreter / productivity is Jonathan Carter's Debian Package of the Day YouTube videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Vi, 12 iun 20, 00:40:40, Phil Morrell wrote: > On Jo, 04 iun 20, 10:13:06, Michael Shuler wrote: > > For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add > > only a few minor changes. Each stable update, I use /etc/skel/.bashrc and > > edit/add in my little bits. > >

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Jo, 04 iun 20, 10:13:06, Michael Shuler wrote: > For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add > only a few minor changes. Each stable update, I use /etc/skel/.bashrc and > edit/add in my little bits. for config in ~/.config/bash/*; do source "$config"; done

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps using > zsh > etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share some good >

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Jo, 04 iun 20, 10:13:06, Michael Shuler wrote: > On 6/3/20 7:30 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a > > Bash prompt. > > For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add > only a few minor changes. Each stable

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hi, > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with > custom prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, > perhaps using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can > you share some good reads (with screenshots) of what you have done? I'm

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Some notes from our defaults at $DAYJOB. I can't take credit for most of this. These were ideas I've picked up from various people along the way. # Prevent users from accidentally overwriting files with redirection. set -o noclobber Warning: While I'm the one that added it, sometimes I don't

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On 6/3/20 7:30 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote: Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a Bash prompt. For many years, I have taken a different approach; use the default and add only a few minor changes. Each stable update, I use /etc/skel/.bashrc and edit/add in my little

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06:29PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps > using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 07:30:01PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Hello world, > > Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a > Bash prompt. I last spent time tweaking it many years ago, so... This > migh reflect what my head was like in the past, not today :-] > > I am

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hi Otto, On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps > using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share > some good reads

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hi Otto, On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06:29PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps using > zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hello world, Like Paul said in his reply, I also have a "bash monstrosity" as a Bash prompt. I last spent time tweaking it many years ago, so... This migh reflect what my head was like in the past, not today :-] I am attaching here the relevant portion of my .bashrc > Basically the only

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:00 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > I would like to add at minimum: > * current git branch (but not -dirty as that can take ages on large repos > on slow media -- you want changing directory to be instant) The standard git prompt stuff supports turning each part off

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On 5/27/20 9:06 PM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps > using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share > some good

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:06:29PM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom > prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps > using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you

Re: Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Le mercredi 27 mai 2020 à 22:06 +0300, Otto Kekäläinen a écrit : > Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with > custom prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, > perhaps using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, > can you share

Pimp your shell - Debian developer tips?

Hello! Do we have Debian devs here who have pimped their shell heavily with custom prompts, colors, command line fonts, shell window title hacks, perhaps using zsh etc? Have you written blogs about you experiences, can you share some good reads (with screenshots) of what you have done? I've read

Re: Updating the New Debian Developer welcome email

Thank you both for your replies. I went ahead and pushed a MR: https://salsa.debian.org/aerostitch/userdir-ldap/merge_requests/1 > Are there discussions about updating welcome email in Debian RT already? I notified the DSA team on #debian-admin as Mattia was saying in #910057 We'll see the

Re: Updating the New Debian Developer welcome email

email if it happens.) > On Oct 3, 2018, at 08:56, James McCoy wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:45:35PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote: >> Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/) > > Congrats! > >> and >> noticed that it's s

Re: Updating the New Debian Developer welcome email

On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 05:45:35PM -0700, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/) Congrats! > and > noticed that it's still referencing alioth for the hosting of VCS > repositories. > > I couldn't find in which repo the templ

Updating the New Debian Developer welcome email

Hi, Yesterday I received my New Debian Developer welcome email (\o/) and noticed that it's still referencing alioth for the hosting of VCS repositories. I couldn't find in which repo the template for this email was hosted. Could you point me to the right repo so I can do a MR for this please

Re: Does anyone know the whereabouts of Risko Gergely [a Debian Developer who seems to be MIA?]

Hi Gergely [and all], On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:12:58 +0200 Gergely Risko wrote: > Hey Shlomi, > > Yes, sorry about not spending enough time on freecell-solver, totally > my mistake and I apologize for it. > first of all, I am glad to hear that you are OK, and accept your

Re: Does anyone know the whereabouts of Risko Gergely [a Debian Developer who seems to be MIA?]

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:12:58AM +0200, Gergely Risko wrote: > Yes, sorry about not spending enough time on freecell-solver, totally > my mistake and I apologize for it. > > Let's hope that I manage to update this package this week. If someone > wants to be co-maintainer of this package with

Re: Does anyone know the whereabouts of Risko Gergely [a Debian Developer who seems to be MIA?]

Hey Shlomi, Yes, sorry about not spending enough time on freecell-solver, totally my mistake and I apologize for it. Let's hope that I manage to update this package this week. If someone wants to be co-maintainer of this package with me, I'm of course more than happy to accept the help! Sorry

Does anyone know the whereabouts of Risko Gergely [a Debian Developer who seems to be MIA?]

Hi all! Does anyone know the whereabout of Riso Gergely ( https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ri...@debian.org - CCed to this message. ) He seems to be missing in action (MIA) since 2014, and he maintains freecell-solver for which I am the upstream. Any help would be appreciated.

Cherche Debian Developer po ur signe ma clé

au moins un Debian Developer. Alors si un DD qui habite ou passe dans le la région de Villefranche sur Saône pouvait signer ma clé ce serait super cool. Sans cette signature de clé il m'est impossible d'intégrer le processus de Debian Maintainer alors s'il vous plait aidez moi. Merci d'avance

Re: Cherche Debian Developer pour signe ma clé

nous. Le seul problème c'est que j'ai besoin de faire signer ma clé PGP par au moins un Debian Developer. Alors si un DD qui habite ou passe dans le la région de Villefranche sur Saône pouvait signer ma clé ce serait super cool. Il y a des gens de Lyon parmi les inscrits sur https

Troubleshooting using Debian developer machines

Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its dependencies and run monotone without root access

Re: Troubleshooting using Debian developer machines

monotone and its dependencies and run monotone without root access to bruckner? Email debian-admin requesting installation of monotone in the chroot. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move

Re: Troubleshooting using Debian developer machines

Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its

Re: Troubleshooting using Debian developer machines

Op do, 04-01-2007 te 13:51 -0700, schreef Shaun Jackman: Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch chroot on bruckner to install monotone

Re: Troubleshooting using Debian developer machines

Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Monotone has a bug (#404616) that seems to only affect powerpc. I don't have access to a powerpc machine myself, so I'd like to use bruckner.debian.org to troubleshoot the bug. How do I use the Etch chroot on bruckner to install monotone and its

Re: Troubleshooting using Debian developer machines

into LDAP, and you can't get to bruckner, you'll want to contact debian-admin since AFAICS the host isn't locked down right now. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL

debian developer

Hi all, I want to step in to be a debian developer. While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked boxes to apply. Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer :-( Here are the two point's: *** If you intend to package software, do you have

Re: debian developer

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote: Hi all, I want to step in to be a debian developer. While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked boxes to apply. Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer :-( Here

Re: debian developer

On 3/10/06, Mark Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is my question: Can anybody help to me to satisfy the demand for the two point's as I'am interested to be a debian developer ? Ahh the the cool factor of having a Debian email address (not that i have one). What can I do to arrive

Re: debian developer

On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 03:27:23PM +0100, Mark Walter wrote: Hi all, Hello. I want to step in to be a debian developer. That's rather question for debian-mentors mailing list. While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked boxes to apply. Two of them are not true

Re: debian developer

Hi, Mark... On Friday 10 March 2006 15:27, Mark Walter wrote: I want to step in to be a debian developer. Great to hear that. While processing the new maintainer's guide I need to cross checked boxes to apply. Two of them are not true for me at all and I can't apply as a developer

Re: debian developer

Hi, Jump in and start doing something for Debian. Whether that is finding fixes for open bugs in our BTS that do not have patches yet, writing documentation, translating stuff that needs to be translated, or packaging software that needs to be packaged (or help package software where the

Re: debian developer

On Friday, 10 March 2006 15:41, Lars Roland wrote: You could subscribe to debian-mentors and start crafting a package. Even though Debian has a impressiv amount of packages there are still some major ones left (mpich2, pvfs2, trac...). trac is in -- Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks,

reactivating my debian developer account

I would like to reactivate my debian developer account. Ive been MIA for a while unfortunately, but have now rearranged my life so I have time to program for fun again. Is there a standard procedure for doing this that someone can point me to? Thanks, Britton Kerin -- Britton Kerin [EMAIL

Re: reactivating my debian developer account

Hi, * Britton Kerin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-21 20:38]: I would like to reactivate my debian developer account. Ive been MIA for a while unfortunately, but have now rearranged my life so I have time to program for fun again. Is there a standard procedure for doing this that someone

Debian Developer Packages Overview new features

Hi all, I'm proud to announce that the new version of DDPO (also known as developer.php) is available with new features: * display information in utf8 charset; * provide popcon information for the source package; * add watch information provided by http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/. All this

Re: Debian Developer LDAP

* Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-04-15 07:50]: On Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:24:44 -0400, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (3) is the email gateway used? I tried but failed to change my latitude/longitude data. None of the following worked. RTFM instructions welcome. RTFM

Re: Debian Developer LDAP

: 130:30:00.000 E --- Lat: 33n45. Long: 130e30. --- Lat: +0334500 Long: +1303000 --- The error message was: == Message Error: Positions were found, but they are not correctly formed Command is not understood. Halted -- Oohara Yuuma [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian developer PGP key (key ID

Debian Developer LDAP

I've volunteered to help build a database of KDE advocates and am starting the design. A previous kde-promo thread mentioned the Debian LDAP gateway as a possible model to follow. I would be interested in any feedback the Debian developers have on this system. It seems to have a lot of nice

Re: Debian Developer LDAP

Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've volunteered to help build a database of KDE advocates and am starting the design. A previous kde-promo thread mentioned the Debian LDAP gateway as a possible model to follow. I would be interested in any feedback the Debian developers have on

Re: Debian Developer LDAP

Hi, Mark Bucciarelli wrote: (2) do people really update their records? (For example, what percentage of entries were updated last year? What percentage of entries have not been updated at all for two years? three years?) Well, personal information is not that often updated when it

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 2:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't appreciate it :)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 17:20]: http://qa.debian.org/developer/ If you want to have it hosted there, you should really a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards for web pages (i.e. have wml

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Hi! This tool is great and very useful. However, there is a little bug with some kind of mangling of the version numbers: on http://qa.debian.org/developer/index.php?package=loadwatch;, loadwatch appears to have 2 different versions in testing and unstable (1.0_1.1alpha1-1 and 1.0+1.1alpha1-1),

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:02:24PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess: - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many Packages version in red either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. - On

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

* Igor Genibel | I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) | following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). | Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your | packages such as: | - the pts related page about packages

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Hello, I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist. Michael

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:53:11AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: Hi Igor, Hi, I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:57:14AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like 'build.php?pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the redirect and follow the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:25:42AM +0200, Michael Piefel écrivait: I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf the Uplpoaders field in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin écrivait: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: Hi, Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a listing of my packages and also those maintained by [EMAIL PROTECTED] We've had issues of my being mistaken for Daniel Stone in the past, and I don't

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides everything that you need ? I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

* Hamish Moffatt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:20:46AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: For Igor, we could provide him a place somewhere under qa.debian.org if he wish I guess. Igor, can you check if satie.debian.org provides everything that you need ? I'm sure some

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf the Uplpoaders field in the control file). Alright, but the description uploaded by developer is a little misleading. I guess it detects the NMU with a regexp in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Hi, Am 28.08.02 um 10:15:45 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: Packages in blue are packages where you're listed as co-maintainers (cf the Uplpoaders field in the control file). Alright, but the description uploaded by developer is a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Am 28.08.02 um 16:03:28 schrieb Igor Genibel: For instance 10a-1.1 for package kimwitu-doc. Or 3.37-3.1 for file. I don't know why there is no Uploader field for those packages. Because packages are not required to have an Uploaders field. I'm afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Le Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 12:17:13PM +0100, Thom May écrivait: I'm sure some will squirm, but I think my.debian.org would work quite nicely :-) uh. E (developer.debian.org, maybe) The new official name is http://qa.debian.org/developer/ Cheers, --

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Because packages are not required to have an Uploaders field. I'm afraid I don't quite understand your algorithm. For which package will there ever be a red markup? I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Michael Piefel wrote: Am 27.08.02 um 13:38:36 schrieb Joey Hess: - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many Packages version in red either, even when

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 11:52:49AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I don't quite understand these colours right now. What does Packages in blue refer to? The link colour? And I don't see many Packages version in red either, even when I'm sure it's an NMU. It's talking about the color of the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

I see an issue with the link to bugs,non-fixed. The web page adds the url tag raw=yes. I'm not certain of the function of that url tag. But, with it in, the bugs page shows all of the active bugs instead of excluding bugs that marked fixed or done. Is this a bug in the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Am 28.08.02 um 17:20:44 schrieb Igor Genibel: I'm sorry I confused the NMU and the uploader field. There was a bug, fixed for now. Ah, great! I really don't have anything to complain about now.[1] Bye, Mike [1] Where I come from, I can't complain is equivalent to I think it's

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

* Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-08-28 17:20]: http://qa.debian.org/developer/ If you want to have it hosted there, you should really a) put the files in CVS (module qa), and follow the current standards for web pages (i.e. have wml files in qa/wml which are build and then copied to

[ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Hi all, I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your packages such as: - the pts related page about packages (Thanks a lot to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). I waiting for you comments, advices, insults or other things. Many thanks for your

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:24:57 +0200 Igor Genibel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); - the broken dependencies for each branch (stable, testing, unstable). This is simply, great. Good work! It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? bWarning/b: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in b/home/igenibel/public_html/html.php/b on line b349/bbr / br / bWarning/b: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in b/home/igenibel/public_html/html.php/b

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I wasn't watching. Thanks! I

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Igor Genibel writes: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Igor Genibel writes: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in Also, if you search for my GPG key id (20687895) then I get a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Igor Genibel writes: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Hi Igor, On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). The site looks great! One request, is it possible to add submit buttons for each of

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:11:40PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: OK, things seem to have suddenly got quite a lot more nifty while I wasn't watching. Thanks! Thanks a lot to. I notice one slight glitch; following a PTS link to a lib* package takes you to e.g.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Igor Genibel writes: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:08:44AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: Hm, am I supposed to get hundreds of kilobytes of this? Surely not ! ;) bWarning/b: Compilation failed: nothing to repeat at offset 9 in b/home/igenibel/public_html/html.php/b on line b349/bbr / br / bWarning/b:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Igor Genibel wrote: Hi all, I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your packages such as: - the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:10:26PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: It would really be nice if it is possible to know if there are any logs with build failure in the buildd link, but it probably needs more work on the buildd page side? Last year (!) I write a patch for the buildd log page and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Am 27.08.02 um 15:03:31 schrieb Colin Watson: I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:36:12AM -0400, Decklin Foster wrote: Hi, I think I've found a bug: aewm is listed as having version 1.0.16-3 in stable and testing, but there is no such version of that package. According to madison 1.2.0-1 is installed in all 3 dists. It is now fixed. As Colin

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:18:58PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Looks like confusion with aewm++, which in turn seems to provoke the bug Daniel Burrows mentioned, so there's probably some additional regexp metacharacter escaping needed somewhere. Yes, very similar problem for kimwitu and

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Am 27.08.02 um 14:24:57 schrieb Igor Genibel: - the number of opened bugs (All, RC, ...); Either I don't understand the statistics, or it's not correct. For instance, on http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php?login=nick you can see there is 1 bug for the file package. But in fact there's

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). This is very nice. A few comments: - It seems to think that analog 2:5.23-0woody1 is a NMU. - On a 1280 pixel wide display, I can only

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:57PM +0200, Igor Genibel wrote: I have enhanced the ddpo (http://people.debian.org/~igenibel/index.php) following all the request you made me (especially Yann Dirson). Now you, developers, can track all the informations about all your packages such as: -

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Debian Developer Packages Overview

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:51:11AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: Although, I have one request -- please skip the ampersand in URLs like 'build.php?pkg=foo', they are redundant and they waste bytes :) On the same note, please add the missing / in pool URLs, to skip the redirect and follow the spec,

Re: Idea: Debian Developer Information Center

Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:58:15PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz écrivait: that's exactly the name i was going to suggest. has the author decided on a language to tame this beast in? if php, i'd love to help. No, not yet. But as it must integrate in what we already have ... WML has support for eperl. But

Re: Idea: Debian Developer Information Center

On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote: No, not yet. But as it must integrate in what we already have ... WML has support for eperl. But I have decided of absolutely nothing and it's possible that I end without eperl and without php with a simple perl script (I don't know python but most

  1   2   >