Re: dpkg symbol handling: looking for advice on #MISSING symbols

2008-01-22 Thread Jiri Palecek
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: Hi all, I'm new to the dpkg symbol handling stuff and I'm trying to add symbols support to the gtkmathview source package. According to http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols/.raw/seedsymbols/libgtkmathview0c2a_i386 there are already symbols which have been

dpkg symbol handling: looking for advice on #MISSING symbols

2008-01-21 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Hi all, I'm new to the dpkg symbol handling stuff and I'm trying to add symbols support to the gtkmathview source package. According to http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols/.raw/seedsymbols/libgtkmathview0c2a_i386 there are already symbols which have been missing between stable version

Re: dpkg symbol handling: looking for advice on #MISSING symbols

2008-01-21 Thread pabs
I looked at the output of this command: c++filt libgtkmathview0c2a_i386 | grep MISSING I see lots of mentions of SmartPtr and a few of TemplateBuilder. ComputerModernShaper seems to be gone. There are some std::* functions gone, but I'm not sure why libgtkmathview should be exporting stuff

Re: dpkg symbol handling: looking for advice on #MISSING symbols

2008-01-21 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked at the output of this command: c++filt libgtkmathview0c2a_i386 | grep MISSING I see lots of mentions of SmartPtr and a few of TemplateBuilder. ComputerModernShaper seems to be gone. It's not gone... if you check carefully you'll

Re: dpkg symbol handling: looking for advice on #MISSING symbols

2008-01-21 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:30:59AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I looked at the output of this command: c++filt libgtkmathview0c2a_i386 | grep MISSING Thanks for the pointer, I wasn't aware of this command. I see lots of mentions of SmartPtr and a few of TemplateBuilder. snip There are