Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
On 2009-08-02 10:16 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-08-02 09:58 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Rob Browning: I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please file bugs as appropriate. Has anybody else experienced the FTBFS related to the removal of dir.old? Not me (building in pbuilder). Well, on closer inspection I can reproduce it. It is due to the install-info transition and depends on whether the dpkg version of install-info or the one from the new install-info package is found, i.e. on the value of PATH. With /usr/sbin before /usr/bin in $PATH (as in debuild or on the buildds) everything is fine, but running debian/rules build fakeroot debian/rules binary as a normal user without /usr/sbin in $PATH fails: , | rm /usr/local/src/deb-src/emacs23/emacs23-23.1+1/debian/emacs23-common/usr/share/info/emacs-23/dir | rm /usr/local/src/deb-src/emacs23/emacs23-23.1+1/debian/emacs23-common/usr/share/info/emacs-23/dir.old | rm: cannot remove `/usr/local/src/deb-src/emacs23/emacs23-23.1+1/debian/emacs23-common/usr/share/info/emacs-23/dir.old': No such file or directory | make: *** [install] Error 1 ` ISTM the fix for the problem is to go through debian/rules and replace all rm $SOMETHING calls with rm -f $SOMETHING. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Great! Anything I could help with, please let me know. On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 13:52 -0700, Rob Browning wrote: I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please file bugs as appropriate. Note that we have also begun the process of removing emacs21 from unstable/testing. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- Best regards, Adrian Perez adrianperez@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Daniel Pittman dan...@rimspace.net writes: 403 Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /~rlb/tmp/emacs23/emacs23_23.1+1-2_i386.changes on this server. OK, that should be fixed now, though I may just take the packages down since it looks like they've made it to unstable. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
* Rob Browning: I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please file bugs as appropriate. Has anybody else experienced the FTBFS related to the removal of dir.old? It also seems to me that the Truetype-capable redisplay code is much, much slower, especially during scrolling. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
On 2009-08-02 09:58 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Rob Browning: I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please file bugs as appropriate. Has anybody else experienced the FTBFS related to the removal of dir.old? Not me (building in pbuilder). It also seems to me that the Truetype-capable redisplay code is much, much slower, especially during scrolling. I haven't tried emacs23 yet, but on recent emacs-snapshot packages I did not experience much of a slowdown compared to emacs22. There is often a delay when Emacs has to display characters that cannot be represented with the current fontset; in this case it takes time to find a a suitable font. However, subsequent scrolling should be fast. Maybe the fact that emacs23 links against libm17n-0 and libotf0 while emacs-snapshot does not can explain the difference. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
* Sven Joachim: Has anybody else experienced the FTBFS related to the removal of dir.old? Not me (building in pbuilder). My sid pbuilder is currently somewhat hosed (due to lack of current aptitude on amd64). 8-/ I will re-check when it's fixed. It also seems to me that the Truetype-capable redisplay code is much, much slower, especially during scrolling. I haven't tried emacs23 yet, but on recent emacs-snapshot packages I did not experience much of a slowdown compared to emacs22. There is often a delay when Emacs has to display characters that cannot be represented with the current fontset; in this case it takes time to find a a suitable font. However, subsequent scrolling should be fast. Perhaps it's also somewhat related to the X server. Most of the CPU usage during scrolling is in the X server. CPU load with Emacs 22 is very low, though. On my system, the redisplay activity is almost noticeable. There is a slight effect, as if it were painted top-down (similar to those slide effects in presentations). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
On 2009-08-02 10:38 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Sven Joachim: I haven't tried emacs23 yet, but on recent emacs-snapshot packages I did not experience much of a slowdown compared to emacs22. There is often a delay when Emacs has to display characters that cannot be represented with the current fontset; in this case it takes time to find a a suitable font. However, subsequent scrolling should be fast. Perhaps it's also somewhat related to the X server. Most of the CPU usage during scrolling is in the X server. CPU load with Emacs 22 is very low, though. On my system, the redisplay activity is almost noticeable. There is a slight effect, as if it were painted top-down (similar to those slide effects in presentations). This must be a problem of the video driver. Scrolling through the HELLO file coming with Emacs, I see the CPU load of Emacs going up (and there is indeed some redisplay lag), but Xorg's CPU usage stays close to 0. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes: Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com writes: Thanks for packaging this, I think you mean: http://alioth.debian.org/~rlb/tmp/emacs23/ Daniel Yes, and thanks. I've just uploaded 23.1+1-2 which fixes some significant problems with 23.1+1-1. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes: Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes: Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com writes: Thanks for packaging this, I think you mean: http://alioth.debian.org/~rlb/tmp/emacs23/ Daniel Yes, and thanks. I've just uploaded 23.1+1-2 which fixes some significant problems with 23.1+1-1. 403 Forbidden: You don't have permission to access /~rlb/tmp/emacs23/emacs23_23.1+1-2_i386.changes on this server. Regards, Daniel -- ✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707 ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
emacs23 uploaded to unstable
I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please file bugs as appropriate. Note that we have also begun the process of removing emacs21 from unstable/testing. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
On 2009-08-01 22:52 +0200, Rob Browning wrote: I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Thanks! Unfortunately, the current status of NEW means that they will probably not be available for the public any time soon. :-( Please file bugs as appropriate. Do you have a private repository where these packages are available for testing? Some add-on packages may not be compatible with emacs23, and it would be good to sort this out ASAP. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: Do you have a private repository where these packages are available for testing? Some add-on packages may not be compatible with emacs23, and it would be good to sort this out ASAP. Sure. For now, I've put copies here: http://alioth.debian.org/~rlb/public_html/tmp/emacs23/ Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Rob Browningr...@defaultvalue.org wrote: Sven Joachim svenj...@gmx.de writes: Do you have a private repository where these packages are available for testing? Some add-on packages may not be compatible with emacs23, and it would be good to sort this out ASAP. Sure. For now, I've put copies here: http://alioth.debian.org/~rlb/public_html/tmp/emacs23/ Thanks for packaging this, I think you mean: http://alioth.debian.org/~rlb/tmp/emacs23/ Daniel -- Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com writes: Thanks for packaging this, I think you mean: http://alioth.debian.org/~rlb/tmp/emacs23/ Daniel Yes, and thanks. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: emacs23 uploaded to unstable
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes: I've uploaded the first emacs23 packages (23.1+1-1) to unstable. Please file bugs as appropriate. Note that we have also begun the process of removing emacs21 from unstable/testing. Thanks for packaging this. I grabbed the source packages you made available, built for amd64, and it emacs23-gtk presently working very nicely. Regards, Daniel -- ✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707 ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
