(Please cc: me if you reply this message.)
Ok, I understand what your thinking. I will not do NMU.
However, I don't think only ALSA 0.5 is stable release. The current
ALSA is also enough stable for sid (unstable release) users. So I
believe the upload of esound with libasound2 to sid
It would be useful if someone would package the current
esound program. The esound package maintainer has clearly
expressed his lack of interest in doing so.
esound2 anyone?
--
Thomas Hood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 09:13:52PM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
This is an ABI change, and as ALSA 0.5 is still the stable release, (and
the only one that seems to work for me) I don't want to change it yet.
Well, what Ryuichi said... ALSA people don't support 0.5 anymore. In any
case, I guess
(Please cc me when you reply this message.)
Hello all,
As I said in Bug#170915, I would like to do NMU for esound package
built with libasound2.
I send the mail one week ago, but the current maintainer have not
replied any more.
any objections?
As in #170923, we have newer version of
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 01:48:12PM +0900, Ryuichi Arafune wrote:
any objections?
This is an ABI change, and as ALSA 0.5 is still the stable release, (and
the only one that seems to work for me) I don't want to change it yet.
As in #170923, we have newer version of esound. If
Debian esound
5 matches
Mail list logo
