Hi Joachim,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer:
Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
two developers, who both use uscan to get the
Hi Lisandro,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 07:53:52PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
it sounded be too good to be true:
$ rm ../*tar.gz uscan --download md5sum
../haskell-ekg_0.3.1.4+dfsg.orig.tar.gz haskell-ekg: Newer version
(0.3.1.4) available on remote site:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 13.03.2014, 14:06 +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
This would be quite annoying in my usual workflow.
I hope you are aware that taring up two byte identical trees usually
does not lead to a byte identical tarball.
Well, I was hoping that uscan would not simply create new
Hi Joachim,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 02:49:00PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I hope you are aware that taring up two byte identical trees usually
does not lead to a byte identical tarball.
Well, I was hoping that uscan would not simply create new tarballs, but
rather removing it from
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 09:07:43 Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 10:34 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
nor mess with tarball repackaging (which I consider ugly, a cludge, and
to be avoided if possible)
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer:
Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
two developers, who both use uscan to get the original tarball for the
same version and with the same File-Excluded get identical
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer:
Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
two developers, who both use uscan to get the original
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 23:02:27 Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 12.03.2014, 18:37 -0300 schrieb Lisandro Damián Nicanor
Pérez Meyer:
Do you (or anyone) know if it repacks the file consistently? I.e. will
two developers, who both use uscan to get the original tarball
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
I guess it just unpacks, removes and repacks. Which also means it would
be quite annoying in my own workflow which involves unpacking/repacking
700MB. The script I'm using now does the filtering on the tar stream
itself, without actually
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 08:06:14AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
I guess it just unpacks, removes and repacks. Which also means it would
be quite annoying in my own workflow which involves unpacking/repacking
700MB. The script I'm using now
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 10:34 +0800 schrieb Paul Wise:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
nor mess with tarball repackaging (which I consider ugly, a cludge, and
to be avoided if possible)
Recent versions of uscan can automatically repack upstream tarballs
Hi.
Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org writes:
Hi,
I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
care deeply about this write a concise wiki page with all that upstream
needs to know about our
Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-03-11 03:32:54)
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
debian.tar.gz/diff.gz or to repack the upstream tarball, probably the
latter since jQuery is usually an embedded code copy.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-03-11 03:32:54)
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
debian.tar.gz/diff.gz or to repack the upstream tarball, probably the
Quoting Joachim Breitner (2014-03-11 11:29:31)
Am Dienstag, den 11.03.2014, 11:22 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
Quoting Russ Allbery (2014-03-11 03:32:54)
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
debian.tar.gz/diff.gz
Hi,
I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
care deeply about this write a concise wiki page with all that upstream
needs to know about our expectations, so that I can point them to it?
That page
On March 10, 2014 06:27:01 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:
Also, am I too pragmatic in suggesting that we should accept non-source
files in tarballs if they are legally distributed and not used during
the build (especially not included in the binary packages)?
I generally take that approach. If
On 2014-03-10 13:05:30, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On March 10, 2014 06:27:01 PM Joachim Breitner wrote:
Also, am I too pragmatic in suggesting that we should accept non-source
files in tarballs if they are legally distributed and not used during
the build (especially not included in the
Hi,
On 2014-03-10 18:27, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
care deeply about this write a concise wiki page with all that upstream
needs to know about our
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-03-10 18:27, Joachim Breitner wrote:
I keep discussing the same issues caused by minified JS files (mostly
JQuery) in their source tarballs over and over. Could maybe those who
care deeply about this write a
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
as long as the code in question is not under a license that requires the
full, non-minified source to be reproduced and if the copyright notices and
license terms as potentially required by the license are present, I don't
see why not. But
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
I'd suggest an acceptable workaround is to include the source in the
debian.tar.gz/diff.gz or to repack the upstream tarball, probably the
latter since jQuery is usually an embedded code copy.
https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
Note that we do not
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
nor mess with tarball repackaging (which I consider ugly, a cludge, and
to be avoided if possible)
Recent versions of uscan can automatically repack upstream tarballs to
remove files, just include a Files-Excluded line in
Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
I think that DFSG item 2 means we have promised not to do this.
Also this particular issue is in the reject FAQ.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html
It would be very helpful if Paul could at this point give a URL to
exactly which item he's
24 matches
Mail list logo
