Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-04 Thread Ian Campbell
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 13:56 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > If you do this, I'd also suggest dropping in a rule for > > > http://bugs.debian.org/libravatar, as I will eventually be moving t

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-03 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 03 Oct 2013, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > > Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this > > > snippet into their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css file: > > > >

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-03 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 10:11:58 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this > > snippet into their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chrome/userContent.css file: > > > > img[src^="http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/lib

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-02 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Don Armstrong , 2013-10-01, 17:10: > >The avatars are now fully federated, and all caching and retrieval > >is now done from debian.org resources, which should mitigate the > >privacy concerns. > > Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can pu

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > Next up I guess is finding a way to have DSA setting up something to > host avatars for @debian.org addresses. hint hint :) I guess they would want to replace the current db.debian.org code with ud first: https://github.com/LucaFilipozzi/ud/

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-10-02, Don Armstrong wrote: > The avatars are now fully federated, and all caching and retrieval is Yay! > Anyone who wants to set up their own > http://wiki.libravatar.org/running_your_own/, or you can use libravatar > or gravatar if you do not wish to do so (or you can do nothing, and

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Don Armstrong , 2013-10-01, 17:10: The avatars are now fully federated, and all caching and retrieval is now done from debian.org resources, which should mitigate the privacy concerns. Iceweasel users who want to mitigate the annoyance can put this snippet into their ~/.mozilla/firefox/*/chr

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-10-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Bart Martens wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:34:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > And I will be implementing caching to address the concerns about web > > tracking, and more importantly, the lack of federation. See #703119 > > et al. > > The caching is a good idea, alth

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Bart Martens wrote: > The caching is a good idea, although I don't think it fully solves > the discussed concerns. Which concerns discussed doesn't it address? 1. Caching on the BTS side means that no one besides bugs.debian.org knows which bugs you are viewing. 2. The only

Re: libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-03-20 Thread Bart Martens
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:34:56PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I too find this totally unacceptable default (to have this enabled > > by default with just the not even yet implemented option to > > opt-out). > > It has already been implemented. See >

libravatar in the BTS [Re: bugs.debian.org: something's wrong...]

2013-03-20 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Holger Levsen wrote: > I too find this totally unacceptable default (to have this enabled > by default with just the not even yet implemented option to > opt-out). It has already been implemented. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/03/msg00302.html And I will be im