Re: maybe a problem with sid branch
Hi, 2009/8/1 Leinier Cruz Salfran salfra...@ipigto.rimed.cu: I disagree with you on this point .. where is success? in a civilized discussion on the proposal and the exchange of ideas .. if we discover that there is a problem why we will not publish this list, for example, although it is obvious that this is a problem of dependencies and is the branch where are shown all recent changes and new packages that have probability of failure? .. I think if we want development we can not be put obstacles .. that is my humble opinion I understand your point, but you should be aware of the definition of this Debian branch: 1) http://www.debian.org/releases/unstable/ 2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Distributions As you can see, in 1) there says: sid is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This can result in a very unstable system which contains packages that cannot be installed due to missing libraries, dependencies that cannot be fulfilled etc. So, in spite of your correct rationale about this, sid may have problems related to _minor_ dependencies and this is the case (because of its changing-nature). This is a common problem when trying to create a base.tgz in pbuilder. Just try again later. Regards, -- Muammar El Khatib. Linux user: 403107. GPG Key = 127029F1 http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org ,''`. : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: maybe a problem with sid branch
Hello Muammar I understand you also .. The only purpose of my post was to warn the person concerned had an error in package dependencies that uploaded to the sid branch in order that he might realize the problem and correct the package My intentions have been good at all times. El lun, 03-08-2009 a las 01:36 -0430, Muammar El Khatib escribió: Hi, 2009/8/1 Leinier Cruz Salfran salfra...@ipigto.rimed.cu: I disagree with you on this point .. where is success? in a civilized discussion on the proposal and the exchange of ideas .. if we discover that there is a problem why we will not publish this list, for example, although it is obvious that this is a problem of dependencies and is the branch where are shown all recent changes and new packages that have probability of failure? .. I think if we want development we can not be put obstacles .. that is my humble opinion I understand your point, but you should be aware of the definition of this Debian branch: 1) http://www.debian.org/releases/unstable/ 2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian#Distributions As you can see, in 1) there says: sid is subject to massive changes and in-place library updates. This can result in a very unstable system which contains packages that cannot be installed due to missing libraries, dependencies that cannot be fulfilled etc. So, in spite of your correct rationale about this, sid may have problems related to _minor_ dependencies and this is the case (because of its changing-nature). This is a common problem when trying to create a base.tgz in pbuilder. Just try again later. Regards, -- Muammar El Khatib. Linux user: 403107. GPG Key = 127029F1 http://muammar.me | http://proyectociencia.org ,''`. : :' : `. `' `- signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
Re: maybe a problem with sid branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: salfrancl:~# pbuilder create --distribution sid [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: aptitude: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.7 but it is not installable Depends: libept0 (= 0.5.26+b1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages - Aborting with an error - unmounting dev/pts filesystem - unmounting proc filesystem - cleaning the build env - removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//31827 and its subdirectories Please see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539376 Daniel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJKdS70AAoJEMs9AU7X8bMq+hwQALYP3OuZeGzvSCCq0ykO03Cl Nxk1XsWia7ryKUq3X55+AH9gjBjxhJGtwhbR3fSNn4DVR0IWF04Mg6J2MiYDbwlP GDW6WCiJJL+XY9nlWZsmyamZ6+avU5vFv42bf/duczmNbipTZBSxJMRFulRd96l0 NEO9LIBeGCrRphFcpJ2KhOaRUN2q2YcA9xfBFDZTXH5NOksLn5w1wYB0gLij/Yzt KK4AgwpU6AtwP++A5YZl7fX/s1SupgGqZP4dbzfzzYOrvIQApgRrsrqB3FO3IGEG PPqwPuKWTxzSBxu4cG5BUnb34C1ov3YVJUuLCFZMs7Iwd2rDp4Pp39OoLf5uoLM8 dLbbYwbn+sa+Xy8l0WfDSthS2Gw8MJk70BOrObTgimakcorPG/VGbP89O/Jzmzg8 gqnv27JqGga6CkjDHrw6XbMH31fy06th9gXvpBo7ml8jmUzFOQO5JCXz6b0OsM3k 8QXLbSn7Fe3voEslAn4lQAP0ChU0ipII5mRzhdKlBgv4xN8aXns16bjOYWJanEwF Nc0884h4pUOyJFOZ2+EPbldxiDhivJbXfEx4zdMvlDKAFOaYsUHOjHSXqImNa6NK 4piwMuJqiHYiMNXf1ZrNM9X/lhg3ZSW0NYePBtMLySVVuPiPdT0bjo3qwwL8G8Nb dDL9WuYNcAieaS8Gcy/p =5jpO -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: maybe a problem with sid branch
Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: aptitude: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.7 but it is not installable Depends: libept0 (= 0.5.26+b1) but it is not going to be installed This is not a problem with sid, but very simply how sid works. It is *normal* that packages are uninstallable sometimes due to uploads of new versions of packages they depend on. That's the whole point of having sid. Sure, it can be inconvenient if that lasts a bit longer sometimes, but normally the people responsible for solving such issues are well aware of them and such mails (or even bug reports like #539376) are not needed. If you use sid and there are minor dependency issues: tough luck, just be patient and try again later! Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: maybe a problem with sid branch
thanks both of you frans and daniel i must to get involved with reportbug El dom, 02-08-2009 a las 08:59 +0200, Frans Pop escribió: Leinier Cruz Salfran wrote: The following packages have unmet dependencies: aptitude: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.7 but it is not installable Depends: libept0 (= 0.5.26+b1) but it is not going to be installed This is not a problem with sid, but very simply how sid works. It is *normal* that packages are uninstallable sometimes due to uploads of new versions of packages they depend on. That's the whole point of having sid. Sure, it can be inconvenient if that lasts a bit longer sometimes, but normally the people responsible for solving such issues are well aware of them and such mails (or even bug reports like #539376) are not needed. I disagree with you on this point .. where is success? in a civilized discussion on the proposal and the exchange of ideas .. if we discover that there is a problem why we will not publish this list, for example, although it is obvious that this is a problem of dependencies and is the branch where are shown all recent changes and new packages that have probability of failure? .. I think if we want development we can not be put obstacles .. that is my humble opinion If you use sid and there are minor dependency issues: tough luck, just be patient and try again later! Cheers, FJP signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
maybe a problem with sid branch
salfrancl:~# pbuilder create --distribution sid [...] The following packages have unmet dependencies: aptitude: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.7 but it is not installable Depends: libept0 (= 0.5.26+b1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages - Aborting with an error - unmounting dev/pts filesystem - unmounting proc filesystem - cleaning the build env - removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//31827 and its subdirectories signature.asc Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
