On Sun Aug 02 09:26, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > All I ask for is that you understand that you are about the change the
> > relavant semantics of something security relevant, and act accordingly.
>
> What? all I'm trying to do is say "hey man, if you need to open a url,
> do it with x-o as you've done
Hi,
I think we make clear our opinions, like they were clear on IRC; but
the reason I started this thread is to have *others* opinions.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 21:12, Bernhard R.
Link wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi [090801 20:22]:
>> x-o is just a glue around other too to try to identify the best
>> candi
* Sandro Tosi [090801 20:22]:
> x-o is just a glue around other too to try to identify the best
> candidate to open a file/URL. So there are 2 options: or is so damn
> wrong that it must be removed from the archive,
I'm not claiming it is totally wrong. As I said I did not look at what
it does. A
Hi Bernhard,
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 18:41, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi [090801 17:55]:
>> [ making sensible-browser a symlink to xdg-open]
>> Honestly, I don't that problem (but it won't surprise anyone if I'm
>> wrong) because it's something similar to double-click on a
>> malicious/
* Sandro Tosi [090801 17:55]:
> [ making sensible-browser a symlink to xdg-open]
> Honestly, I don't that problem (but it won't surprise anyone if I'm
> wrong) because it's something similar to double-click on a
> malicious/dangerous executable in a file manager, hence why I wanted
> to bring this
Hi all,
this comes from #539191 and the discussion that generated on #d-devel.
With Clint (s-b maintainer) we seem to agreed that since:
- xdg-open identifies the preferred browser the user selected in his
DE environment (like Gnome, KDE, XFCE, etc)
- s-b relies on alternatives, that might differ
6 matches
Mail list logo
