On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 04:13:59PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved
if
the package in
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if
the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the
file(s) involved are other distributable, as at that point it's basically a
Am Freitag, den 12.06.2015, 20:50 +1000 schrieb Craig Small:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 02:05:11PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
With my SRM hat on, we're generally happy to consider the issue resolved if
the package in unstable contains the correct license information and the
file(s) involved
On 2015-06-08 13:41, Craig Small wrote:
I'm trying to work out what would be the best way forward for this.
mudlet has an icon, mudlet.svg which had a cc-by-nc-sa license.
I reported it to upstream who basically said oh yeah, we stuffed up,
not sure how it got there, fixed now.
Do I need to
Hi,
I'm trying to work out what would be the best way forward for this.
mudlet has an icon, mudlet.svg which had a cc-by-nc-sa license.
I reported it to upstream who basically said oh yeah, we stuffed up,
not sure how it got there, fixed now.
Do I need to rebuild mudlet for jessie to fix this?
5 matches
Mail list logo
