Re: mupdf (was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-20 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2014-01-20 12:54:30, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Jens Oliver John wrote: > >> $ apt-cache show mupdf > >> MuPDF is a lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C. > >> (...) > > > > The mupdf PDF reader is supposed to be minimal and makes on me the >

Re: mupdf (was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-20 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:34 AM, Jens Oliver John wrote: >> $ apt-cache show mupdf >> MuPDF is a lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C. >> (...) > > The mupdf PDF reader is supposed to be minimal and makes on me the impression > of > being more a reference implementation using

Re: mupdf (was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-19 Thread Jens Oliver John
> $ apt-cache show mupdf > MuPDF is a lightweight PDF viewer and toolkit written in portable C. > (...) The mupdf PDF reader is supposed to be minimal and makes on me the impression of being more a reference implementation using the mupdf library. A more featureful but still light PDF reader, whi

Re: mupdf (was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-19 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 20, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > I've just had a look at it, and found that it misses some important > features present in xpdf, e.g. Let me add: * an higher zoom level -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

mupdf (was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-19 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2014-01-13 10:43:50 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > While someone could fix the package, you may want to consider not doing > so. After running into endless bugs in xpdf, I personally switched to > mupdf for a light-weight PDF reader and found it superior in every respect > except for the fact tha

Re: mupdf (Was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-14 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Ma, 14 ian 14, 08:50:29, Andreas Tille wrote: > window. Not sure whether this is a bug or a feature - but for > presentations ist seems I need to stick to evince. Check out pdf-presenter-console or zathura (if you you don't mind the vim-style interface). Kind regards, Andrei -- http://wiki.d

Re: mupdf (Was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-14 Thread Dominik George
>I also read this (I love that short docs) but there is a very thick >remaining gray frame - it seems the scaling is done only by integer >numbers which is for sure quick but the result is not what I want. Hmm. I cannot reproduce that, sorry! -nik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ

Re: mupdf (Was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:13:36AM +0100, Dominik George wrote: > > I would love to have it *real* fullscreen > >since > > > > f Toggles fullscreen mode. > > > >... but the rendered PDF remains in a small section in the middle of > >the > >window. Not sure whether this is a bug or a fe

Re: mupdf (Was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-14 Thread Dominik George
> I would love to have it *real* fullscreen >since > > f Toggles fullscreen mode. > >... but the rendered PDF remains in a small section in the middle of >the >window. Not sure whether this is a bug or a feature - but for >presentations ist seems I need to stick to evince. Or you cont

mupdf (Was: xpdf removed from testing?)

2014-01-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Russ, On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:43:50AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > While someone could fix the package, you may want to consider not doing > so. After running into endless bugs in xpdf, I personally switched to > mupdf for a light-weight PDF reader and found it superior in every respect > e