* Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk, 2012-08-06, 16:15:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
crm: crm114
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-09-21, 17:42:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different
directories within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in
/usr/sbin):
There's a few more if you take alternatives into account:
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-08-06, 15:37:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different
directories within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in
/usr/sbin):
There's a few more if you take alternatives into account:
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
There's a few more if you take alternatives into account:
tf: tf tf5
(Speaking with my tf5 maintainer hat on.) The current arrangement of
these packages is weird, but I'm not sure how much trouble it's causing.
tf ships /usr/games/tf and tf5 ships
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
/usr/games is a swamp for another time I think. I guess it contains
an awful lot of things with clashing names.
Last I checked the latest FHS drafts removed /usr/games entirely, so the
morass might end up being dumped into /usr/bin
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
/usr/games is a swamp for another time I think. I guess it contains
an awful lot of things with clashing names.
Last I checked the latest FHS drafts removed /usr/games
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 01:00:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
/usr/games is a swamp for another time I think. I guess it contains
an awful lot of things with clashing names.
Last I
* Dmitrijs Ledkovs x...@debian.org, 2012-08-07, 22:47:
Does this include search across all components of standard $PATH
Yes, modulo bugs (see my other message in this thread).
and across all packages?
Yes, on i386 and amd64. If you check kfreebsd-* there's also this one:
ztest: zfsutils
Hi,
On 08.08.2012 17:53, Jakub Wilk wrote:
ztest: zfsutils zutils
Hum, thanks for spotting that, but what to do here? Both packages
legitimately ship a ztest. Admittedly it is not very important for
zfsutils, don't know about zutils. Having that said, lots of upstream
tutorials and
Na grupie linux.debian.devel napisałe(a)ś:
There might be even more if you assume that you can co-install Linux an=
d
kFreeBSD binaries (yay, multi-arch world!).
They might be co-installable but not executable (for the time being).
The Linux emulation layer which is featured by kFreeBSD only
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 22:21 +0200, Jarek Kamiński wrote:
Na grupie linux.debian.devel napisałe(a)ś:
There might be even more if you assume that you can co-install Linux an=
d
kFreeBSD binaries (yay, multi-arch world!).
They might be co-installable but not executable (for the time
Le lundi 06 août 2012 à 15:37 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
Thanks.
There’s also epiphany (maybe your forgot
On 08/06/2012 03:37 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
crm: crm114 pacemaker
cutter:
Josselin Mouette writes (Re: node-like file conflicts):
Le lundi 06 août 2012 à 15:37 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another
* Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org, 2012-08-07, 08:13:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
Thanks.
There’s also epiphany (maybe your forgot
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:14:19PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
[...]
guess: nvram-wakeup sgt-puzzles
[...]
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
sgt-puzzles
[...]
There are a lot of short and generic names in this package. I
appended 'game' to some of them to avoid such conflicts when
originally
Ben Hutchings writes (Re: node-like file conflicts):
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 04:14:19PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
[...]
guess: nvram-wakeup sgt-puzzles
[...]
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
sgt-puzzles
[...]
There are a lot of short and generic names in this package. I
appended
Ian Jackson ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
So, Simon, if these puzzle names should be qualified to make them more
unique on the PATH, what formulaic change should be made ? My
recommendation would be sgt-* on the grounds that that's unlikely to
conflict, although it might of course
guess: nvram-wakeup sgt-puzzles
That's an awfully generic name for a program which gets run exactly once per
motherboard to figure out some hardware configuration :-(
Not knowing the game I would recommend renaming the nvram-wakeup thingy.
Olaf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 6 August 2012 14:37, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
crm: crm114 pacemaker
Hi!
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:37:11 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different
directories within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in
/usr/sbin):
Ralf Treinen has been running automated tests [0]
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
crm: crm114 pacemaker
cutter: cutter-testing-framework-bin cutter
gearmand:
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 15:37 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
crm: crm114 pacemaker
Jakub Wilk writes (node-like file conflicts):
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different directories
within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in /usr/sbin):
sethdlc: ax25-tools dahdi
crm: crm114 pacemaker
cutter
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 16:15 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
I'll double check the facts of course. If I have also see if I can
understand the situation in each case well enough to make a
recommendation. It seems at the very least that many of these issues
are within a particular family of
* Weldon Goree wel...@b.rontosaur.us, 2012-08-06, 11:24:
Also siggen is paired with itself in that list.
No, the list is in format:
binary: package1 package2
Sorry, I should have written it in my original message - now I see it's
not obvious.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 17:39 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
No, the list is in format:
D'oh. Thanks. I'll still see if I can tease out which of those are
binaries trying to do the same thing and which are completely unrelated.
Weldon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Aug 06, Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
gearmand: gearman-job-server gearman-server
These are two implementation of the same protocol.
tcpd: tcm tcpd
I hope it is obvious that we cannot rename the real tcpd. :-)
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org, 2012-08-06, 15:37:
The following package pairs:
1) are co-installable,
2) both ship binaries with the same name, but in different
directories within $PATH (e.g. one in /usr/bin, another in
/usr/sbin):
I forgot to attach dd-list. Doing so now.
--
Jakub Wilk
29 matches
Mail list logo
