Hello,
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 10:44:07AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
Shachar Shemeshshac...@debian.org writes:
I am subscribed to lots and lots of mailing lists. All mail from those
lists gets automatically delivered to dedicated folders automatically.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
My trick to get extra copies of direct replies to my own mails in
mailing lists (I place such copies into a dedicated folder) is to keep
a local cache of Message-IDs of my own sent messages and then check
In-Reply-To: header in the
Hello Shachar Shemesh,
Am 2011-03-13 19:54:01, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
If I set reply-to to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I
set it to the list, it won't go to me. Either way, the desired
effect isn't achieved.
Also, reply-to is the wrong tool for this job (this is NOT
Hello Carsten Hey,
Am 2011-03-12 10:50:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
If a message I reply to contains a Mail-Followup-To: set, I use it. If
not, I guess if the person I reply to wants to receive a reply. To
prevent me to Cc: you, you need to explicitly set Mail-Followup-To: to
the
On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
Shachar Shemeshshac...@debian.org writes:
Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the
Le samedi 12 mars 2011 à 10:50 +0100, Carsten Hey a écrit :
I set Mail-Followup-To: on every mail I send to *@lists.debian.org.
Most DDs just ignore it (though there are some exceptions) and this
renders using Mail-Followup-To: to get a copy to be rather useless.
Maybe this is because
On Du, 13 mar 11, 10:44:07, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 13/03/11 08:19, Ben Finney wrote:
If you like to get two copies, why can't you arrange to generate the
extra copies you want without involving anyone else's configuration?
Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:'
On 13/03/11 11:29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:' appropriately, this is what it's for.
If I set reply-to to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I set
it to the list, it won't go to me. Either way, the desired effect isn't
On Du, 13 mar 11, 19:54:01, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
On 13/03/11 11:29, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Any suggestions on how to do it?
By setting 'Reply-To:' appropriately, this is what it's for.
If I set reply-to to myself, the mail won't go to the list. If I
set it to the list, it won't go to me.
On 13/03/11 20:55, Andrei Popescu wrote:
At least with mutt I distinctively recall it replied both to the list
and CCd the poster on list-reply.
That is a specific Mutt work around for broken lists that add reply-to
automatically. It is not generally available.
Not sure about other mailers
* jida...@jidanni.org [2011-03-12 11:14 +0800]:
Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
keystrokes, only to receive
I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
* Carsten Hey [2011-03-12 10:50 +0100]:
There are examples where we lost potential future maintainers because
they never received a reply to an RFS. These replies were sent to the
list, but they were not sent to those requesting sponsorship.
To clarify this: the problem was not that
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:57:29PM +0100, Carsten Hey wrote:
[...]
How should new people know that they don't get a copy of replies
to their messages unless they explicitly request one?
Maybe it's a generational difference... as I expect did authors of
the code of conduct, I came up on bulletin
Shachar Shemesh shac...@debian.org writes:
Personally, I think the code of conduct should be amended, along with
the list software.
While this shouldn't turn into a counting of popularity, I'd like to
register that there are people who think the list behaviour currently
(leave the Reply-To
Recently I replied to a certain message on this list with my familiar
S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
keystrokes, only to receive
I'm subscribed to the list, no need to CC me:
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
No need to reply to this message.
And
On 12/03/11 05:14, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
Therefore perhaps
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
could be amended to mention that adding a Mail-Followup-To header might
add an additional wall of defense for those who wish to cut down even
further the possibility they might
16 matches
Mail list logo
