On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
If Priorities aren't going to be updated in a timely manner within
sid distribution, it might be time to rethink about its usefulness.
Agreed.
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that
priorities are fixed by ftp-masters.
There needs to be a decision somewhere:
1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before
and make --resolve-deps the default in debootstrap
2. try to fix priorities/section
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
AFAIK the plan is to not constantly bother the ftp masters with override
changes,
Which makes the whole packages buggy according to the policy.
Bastian
--
A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her.
On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:12:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Yes, I don't have --resolve-deps, in the hope that
priorities are fixed by ftp-masters.
There needs to be a decision somewhere:
1. ignore priorities and go back to what it was before
and make
Hi,
That said, I think it's good to use --resolve-deps by default for
testing/unstable, so that override changes aren't that urgent (they don't
break daily builds etc every other day), and can be batched up a bit, and
processed when the dependency graph is a bit stable. Which may very well be
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
debootstrap test:
[FAIL] create-sid-debootstrap
[FAIL] build-sid-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-sid-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-internal-sid-dsh
[FAIL] create-etch-debootstrap
[FAIL] build-etch-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-etch-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-internal-etch-dsh
[FAIL] update-etch-sid.log
Hi,
debootstrap test:
[FAIL] create-sid-debootstrap
[FAIL] build-sid-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-sid-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-internal-sid-dsh
[FAIL] create-etch-debootstrap
[FAIL] build-etch-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-etch-dsh
[FAIL] pdebuild-internal-etch-dsh
[FAIL] update-etch-sid.log
[FAIL]
Hi,
pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
Not for me.
I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
It wasn't able to use this mirror
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
It wasn't able to use this mirror with pbuilder+cdebootstrap because
cdebootstrap will see Release.gpg
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 08:25:23PM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
I own a small modem line, but can download elsewhere.
It wasn't able to use this mirror with
Hello Junichi!
Junichi Uekawa Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
Not for me.
I maintain my own small mirror by apt-move together with apt-zip because
I own a small modem line, but can
Hi,
pbuilder is doing as usual; it's now switched over to
cdebootstrap and cdebootstrap has been working fine.
However, you do need to use the sid version of pbuilder
and cdebootstrap for things to work.
Also, with changes to 'su'; pbuilder stable backports
to be a requirement.
I've moved
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 02:48:31PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
with your uploads :-)
I'm looking for someone to upload the following packages
canna_3.7p3-2_i386.changes: translation updates
Hi,
Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
with your uploads :-)
I'm looking for someone to upload the following packages
canna_3.7p3-2_i386.changes: translation updates
d-shlibs_0.26_i386.changes: error checking fix
Hi,
Thanks for sponsoring.
Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
with your uploads :-)
I'm looking for someone who can upload my jack0.100.0 transition packages;
care to sponsor?
They are available:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I'm looking for someone who can upload my jack0.100.0 transition packages;
care to sponsor?
Uploading right now...
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
I'll sponsor all your packages.
Same here. With two sponsors, I doubt you'll have much of a latency trouble
with your uploads :-)
--
One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind
Hi,
I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat
soonish.
I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken,
and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing,
my new gpg key is not in the keyring yet.
I'll sponsor all your
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:46:16AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat
soonish.
I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken,
and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing,
my new gpg key is
Hi,
pbuilder CVS has a rough support for cdebootstrap;
it seems to be doing well, today it's not working
for me; maybe it could do better sometime.
This morning I've tried again, and apparently it's doing something
good.
I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:51:25AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I'm planning on getting a cdebootstrap supported version released somewhat
soonish.
I'd be looking for sponsored upload, since if I'm not mistaken,
and finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] is telling me the correct thing,
my new gpg key is not
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 11:36:47AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314858
seems to be required; please somebody NMU debootstrap.
Done.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux
: :' : Free Operating System
`. `' http://debian.org/
Hi,
I'm sending an update on how pbuilder/debootstrap is doing right now.
pbuilder CVS has a rough support for cdebootstrap;
it seems to be doing well, today it's not working
for me; maybe it could do better sometime.
Patch in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=314858
seems to
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:54:15AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
Ideally there needs to be either
* a login environment where changes are saved AND/OR
there is one: use
pbuilder login --save-after-login
(have been confronted with the same problem yesterday...)
--
c u
henning
--
To
Hi,
Thanks for the comments.
Ideally there needs to be either
* a login environment where changes are saved AND/OR
* a hook that gets executed for an update operation, *before* apt-get
is called.
Luckily, since pbuilder 0.118 which was released 31 Oct 2004,
there is a
Hi,
I'll just write a mail here to notify people using pbuilder, that
sid is a wild place.
My testsuite tells me that currently Debian sid/etch is not
debootstrap'able. This is due to several problems,
including g++ ABI transition breaking aptitude.
However, the good news is that you should
Junichi == Junichi Uekawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Junichi Hi, I'll just write a mail here to notify people using
Junichi pbuilder, that sid is a wild place.
I recently had major dramas trying to create a sid chroot from a sarge
system. So perhaps these issues have been fixed for sid
27 matches
Mail list logo
