Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

pe, 2006-08-11 kello 14:42 +1000, Brian May kirjoitti: Can the argument be made that these aren't packaging bugs but rather the fact the hostname hasn't been configured correctly? Not only can that argument be made, but I would like to make it myself. I'll fix the chroot piuparts uses so that

Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

ke, 2006-08-09 kello 10:21 +0300, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti: While I wait to have time to do something better and more easily usable, the following page lists the logs of failed piuparts files that have not yet been processed: http://piuparts.cs.helsinki.fi/fail/ I made some more logs

Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

ke, 2006-08-09 kello 11:45 -0700, Kevin B. McCarty kirjoitti: I was looking through these, and at least the following errors appear to be false positives for the given packages, caused only by some combination of x11-common, xcursor-themes, xutils (which leaves behind junk in /etc/X11/rstart),

Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

Lars == Lars Wirzenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars While I wait to have time to do something better and more Lars easily usable, the following page lists the logs of failed Lars piuparts files that have not yet been processed: Lars http://piuparts.cs.helsinki.fi/fail/

piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

While I wait to have time to do something better and more easily usable, the following page lists the logs of failed piuparts files that have not yet been processed: http://piuparts.cs.helsinki.fi/fail/ Processing the logs means things like: * checking that the failure wasn't due to a bad

Re: piuparts unprocessed failed logs page

Hi Lars, I was looking through these, and at least the following errors appear to be false positives for the given packages, caused only by some combination of x11-common, xcursor-themes, xutils (which leaves behind junk in /etc/X11/rstart), xlibs-data (which leaves things in