Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-18 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On 17 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple > > subnets; if that's the case, taking it out makes the dist lose > > functionality. (A real bummer if there are no problems with dhcp-bet

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread peloy
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple > subnets; if that's the case, taking it out makes the dist lose > functionality. (A real bummer if there are no problems with dhcp-beta > other than the name.) Oppsss!! I didn't know th

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread Avery Pennarun
On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 10:55:26AM -0400, Brian White wrote: > There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed > from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just > this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks. dhcp-client-beta is seriously broken

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread Michael Stone
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Probably it is a good idea to move the dhcp-beta's to Slink but just > so we do not provide beta packages in our next stable release. AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple subnets; if that's the case, taking it out make

Re: removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread peloy
Hi Brian, Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed > from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just > this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks. The "important" or "critical" bug report is aga

removal of dhcp-beta?

1998-06-17 Thread Brian White
There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks. Brian ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )