On 17 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple
> > subnets; if that's the case, taking it out makes the dist lose
> > functionality. (A real bummer if there are no problems with dhcp-bet
Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple
> subnets; if that's the case, taking it out makes the dist lose
> functionality. (A real bummer if there are no problems with dhcp-beta
> other than the name.)
Oppsss!! I didn't know th
On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 10:55:26AM -0400, Brian White wrote:
> There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed
> from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just
> this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks.
dhcp-client-beta is seriously broken
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Probably it is a good idea to move the dhcp-beta's to Slink but just
> so we do not provide beta packages in our next stable release.
AFAIK, dhcp-beta is the only version that can be used with multiple
subnets; if that's the case, taking it out make
Hi Brian,
Brian White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed
> from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just
> this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks.
The "important" or "critical" bug report is aga
There is a bug against dhcp-client-beta that is causing it to be removed
from Hamm. Should all "dhcp-beta" packages be removed or is omitting just
this one okay? I need to know asap. Thanks.
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
6 matches
Mail list logo