Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/amd64.debian.net$ madison editex
editex |0.0.5-6 |stable | source
editex |0.0.5-6 | unstable | source
As you can see editex
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 06:42:15PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/org/amd64.debian.net$ madison editex
editex |0.0.5-6 |stable | source
editex |0.0.5-6 | unstable | source
As you can see editex is already removed from etch since Heidi syncs
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official
debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query
packages.debian.org for the editex source package.
Is that known?
No. removals should propagate to amd64
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 18:42 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official
debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query
packages.debian.org for the editex source
While we are it ... I noticed that removal of packages from the official
debian archive are not propagated to the amd64 archive. E.g. query
packages.debian.org for the editex source package.
Is that known?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy
[EMAIL
5 matches
Mail list logo