Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-05-14 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2007-05-07 13:13:59, schrieb Wouter Verhelst: On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Something like a monthly reminder sent over

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-05-08 Thread David Moreno Garza
Andrei Popescu: Next spammers will go ahead and whitelist themselves, too. Then what is the purpose of [EMAIL PROTECTED] The purpose is quite clear, the real question would be how whitelist@ manages suscribing, whitelisting. Is this only by been suscribed? Or does some other policy apply?

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-05-07 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:13:50AM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:01:36PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: I belive that a rate of 0.1% is quite an acceptable rate, but we permanently try to lower that. I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-05-07 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Something like a monthly reminder sent over all lists or similar. Next spammers will go

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-05-07 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 01:13:59PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Something like a monthly reminder sent over all lists or similar. Next spammers will go

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-05-06 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:01:36PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: I belive that a rate of 0.1% is quite an acceptable rate, but we permanently try to lower that. I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? Not really; it's just the continuing battle between spammers and Blars (and to a lesser extent, the rest of us

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed Apr 25, 2007 at 01:08:32 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? Not really; it's just the continuing

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Greg Folkert
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 17:01 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: Perhaps we should really propose a Day of No Spam-Filtering on lists.d.o. ;-) Umm, is there enough BANDWIDTH ON THE ENTARWEB to support that? /me thinks not -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better,

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: How does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)? If anyone is doing a substantially better job of filtering than the bts is, let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know; but in general you should just see the few spammers who end up being successful. I have been

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Steve Greenland
On 25-Apr-07, 11:45 (CDT), Kamaraju S Kusumanchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been dealing with gcc's bugzilla, KDE's bugs.kde.org, mozilla's bug tracking system etc., I never ever received any spam messages from these bug tracking systems. The spam emails seem to come only from BTS. May be

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:45:06PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: I have been dealing with gcc's bugzilla, KDE's bugs.kde.org, mozilla's bug tracking system etc., I never ever received any spam messages from these bug tracking systems. The spam emails seem to come only from BTS. May be we

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread David Moreno Garza
Steve Greenland wrote: I'd guess that Bugzilla's mandatory registration is why. OTOH, Bugzilla's mandatory is why I rarely report bugs for projects that use Bugzilla. I don't think making it harder for users to report problems is a good trade-off. I totally agree on this. The easier we get

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-25 Thread Luis Matos
Qua, 2007-04-25 às 13:50 -0500, David Moreno Garza escreveu: Steve Greenland wrote: I'd guess that Bugzilla's mandatory registration is why. OTOH, Bugzilla's mandatory is why I rarely report bugs for projects that use Bugzilla. I don't think making it harder for users to report problems is

spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-24 Thread Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)? hth raju -- Kamaraju S Kusumanchi http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/ http

Re: spam from bugs.debian.org

2007-04-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 06:04, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: Of late, I have been seeing a lot of spam from bugs.debian.org . I never got this many spam emails from BTS. Has something changed? How does everyone deal with this (I mean other than filtering)? Yes, both the admins of the BTS