On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:42:30 +0200, Holger Levsen
hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Marc Haber wrote:
We're going to have a TC decision or a GR about this anyway.
why do you think so?
Because I think that a decision of this magnitude should not be taken
by a single
On Mon, 13 May 2013 02:31:02 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
Maybe kfreebsd will do, but as I explained at FOSDEM I plan to make udev
depend on either upstart or systemd.
I would rather not be the one who will choose which one of them, so
I hope that we will get to a consensus about
Hi Marc,
On Freitag, 17. Mai 2013, Marc Haber wrote:
We're going to have a TC decision or a GR about this anyway.
why do you think so?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 02:31:02AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On May 13, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
actually, while it has been brought up as a theoretical/wrong argument,
that
we cannot switch our linux installation ship with $this init system, while
the
kfreebsd
Marco d'Itri m...@linux.it writes:
On May 13, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
actually, while it has been brought up as a theoretical/wrong argument, that
we cannot switch our linux installation ship with $this init system, while
the
kfreebsd port uses $that init system, I'd
On 2013-05-12 21:31, m...@linux.it wrote:
Maybe kfreebsd will do, but as I explained at FOSDEM I plan to make
udev
depend on either upstart or systemd.
do you have a link to a presentation, blog post, or whatever explaining
the rationale behind this?
i didn't found anything on FOSDEM
On May 13, gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar wrote:
On 2013-05-12 21:31, m...@linux.it wrote:
Maybe kfreebsd will do, but as I explained at FOSDEM I plan to
make udev depend on either upstart or systemd.
do you have a link to a presentation, blog post, or whatever
explaining the
On May 13, Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:
No matter what the technical merits, the inevitable flame war regarding
copyright assignment seems very likely to render upstart a non-starter
as an essential element of Debian.
I think that this is a reasonable element to consider in our decision
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:46:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
There is no need for udev to be dependent upon a specific init
system, other than laziness.
Except if you want to receive device plug events as triggers to start
up / shut down services. The separation then gets quite blurry with
whom
2013/5/13 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:46:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
There is no need for udev to be dependent upon a specific init
system, other than laziness.
Except if you want to receive device plug events as triggers to start
up / shut down services. The
2013/5/14 Игорь Пашев pashev.i...@gmail.com:
2013/5/13 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 08:46:23AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
There is no need for udev to be dependent upon a specific init
system, other than laziness.
Except if you want to receive device plug events as
Hi,
On Montag, 13. Mai 2013, Josselin Mouette wrote:
I was all for kfreebsd when it was proposed, but now that it exists and
nobody uses it, I am appalled at the idea of using it as an excuse to
stop making improvements to the linux ports.
actually, while it has been brought up as a
On May 13, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org wrote:
actually, while it has been brought up as a theoretical/wrong argument, that
we cannot switch our linux installation ship with $this init system, while
the
kfreebsd port uses $that init system, I'd say nobody is seriously saying this
13 matches
Mail list logo
