Re: udev event completion order (was: Re: Debian Installer team monthly meeting minutes (20051214 meeting))

2005-12-18 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 18, Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An alternative appears to be to process events in series... or maybe delaying This was the precedent approach, and it's much slower (also, it cannot be implemented anymore with just udevd). -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: udev event completion order (was: Re: Debian Installer team monthly meeting minutes (20051214 meeting))

2005-12-18 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:52:42AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Dec 18, Darren Salt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: An alternative appears to be to process events in series... or maybe delaying This was the precedent approach, and it's much slower (also, it cannot be implemented anymore with

udev event completion order (was: Re: Debian Installer team monthly meeting minutes (20051214 meeting))

2005-12-17 Thread Darren Salt
[CC'ing hotplug-devel] I demand that Marco d'Itri may or may not have written... On Dec 17, Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is currently very likely that systems with two network interfaces will end up with both switched on the installed system after the reboot. This is of