uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED], José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] DM-Upload-Allowed: yes I signed the package using debsign with my gpg key, that is in the file /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg: $ gpg --list-options show-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg --list-key EEA07609 Keyring: /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg --- pub 1024D/EEA07609 2007-04-05 uid Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] sub 2048g/4035EBFD 2007-04-05 Uploaded to ftp-master and got an email back: Rejected: dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] may not upload/NMU source package python-numpy Where is the corret place to ask about this problem? Thanks, Ondrej
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
2007/12/4, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED], José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] DM-Upload-Allowed: yes I signed the package using debsign with my gpg key, that is in the file /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg: $ gpg --list-options show-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg --list-key EEA07609 Keyring: /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg --- pub 1024D/EEA07609 2007-04-05 uid Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] sub 2048g/4035EBFD 2007-04-05 Uploaded to ftp-master and got an email back: Rejected: dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] may not upload/NMU source package python-numpy Where is the corret place to ask about this problem? I had the same problem as you. Have a look at: http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2007/11/msg00201.html You'll probably have to add the prefix XS- to DM-Upload-Allowed Greetings, Miry
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED], José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] DM-Upload-Allowed: yes If you build the package you will see dpkg complain that it doesn't know about this field. To get the field included in the dsc, you have to prefix it with XS- -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:36:22PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED], José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] DM-Upload-Allowed: yes The current version of python-numpy in the archive doesn't have the DM-Upload-Allowed line. You need a sponsor to upload your package with the DM-Upload-Allowed line and after that you'll be allowed to upload python-numpy. I signed the package using debsign with my gpg key, that is in the file /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg: $ gpg --list-options show-keyring --keyring /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg --list-key EEA07609 Keyring: /usr/share/keyrings/debian-maintainers.gpg --- pub 1024D/EEA07609 2007-04-05 uid Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] sub 2048g/4035EBFD 2007-04-05 Uploaded to ftp-master and got an email back: Rejected: dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] may not upload/NMU source package python-numpy Where is the corret place to ask about this problem? Thanks, Ondrej signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
The DM-Upload-Allowed field in debian/control must be written as XS-DM-Upload-Allowed, so that it gets propagated to the .dsc. Cheers, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org Listening to: Martirio - No te mires en el río -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uploaders: Marco Presi (Zufus) [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexandre Fayolle [EMAIL PROTECTED], José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthias Klose [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] DM-Upload-Allowed: yes I may be wrong, be shouldn't it be something in the spirit XS-DM-Upload-Allowed, so that it ends up in the source package ? See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2007/11/msg00201.html Cheers, Vincent PS: I'm CCing you just in case ;-)... -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ -- pretty boring signature, isn't it ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Ondrej Certik schrieb: Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Have you read the changelog of debian-maintainers? debian-maintainers (1.4) unstable; urgency=low * Removed keyring admin Brian Nelson. Closes: #452828 * Removed keyring admin Michael Beattie. * Removed Debian maintainer Kartik Mistry. -- Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:59:13 +0100 There's also http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/11/msg00176.html Maybe it's best to reply there. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Michael Biebl wrote: Ondrej Certik schrieb: Hi, I recently become a Debian Maintainer, so I wanted to upload a new version of python-numpy package, relevant fields from debian/control: Have you read the changelog of debian-maintainers? Since when is Ondrej == Kartik? -- Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzed.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Bernd Zeimetz schrieb: Since when is Ondrej == Kartik? lol, I somehow managed to mix up Kartik and Certik ;-) Sorry Ondrej for this faux pax. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: uploading as Debian Maintainer - rejected
Hi Miriam, Joey, Aníbal, Adeodato, Vincent, Michael and Bernd, you are right, it's most probably the missing XS-. Thanks for finding this out. I recently created a wiki page: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer because I wasn't able to google this page, that I just found: http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers that describes everything, including my problem, so I linked the second one from the first one. PS: I'm CCing you just in case ;-)... I am subscribed. :) Also on -announce, devel-announce, -qa, -python. But I wasn't to -newmaint, which I should have had. I fixed that now. lol, I somehow managed to mix up Kartik and Certik ;-) Sorry Ondrej for this faux pax. No problem, I was just curious, what you concluded from that changelog. Ondrej
